• FaeDrifter
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m all for Marxism, but I haven’t observed the “body of economic theory” having any relevance, except as a snooby self-righteous justification for authoritarianism and violence.

    Even if you were to strip all moral interpretation away, violence and authoritarianism is unstable and ineffective. ML’s in practice are fake progressives, because they don’t even care for finding a stable effective solution. The progression of society is no longer the point.

    • archomrade [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      From their perspective, all states (especially western liberal states) use violence to enforce their capitalistic order. “Authority” is broadly interpreted as ubiquitous, and all successful revolutions have been to some degree violent.

      Not to suggest all authority and violence is the same, but to them, the liberal apprehension to utilize violence is a self-imposed handicap that not even their opposition undertakes.

      Similar to leftists frustration with establishment Democrats from using their majority to enact progressive reform.

      To them, the only distinction left is the economic structuring that violence is utilized on behalf of.

      Again, not my personal position, but this “auth communists are the same as right wing authoritarians” is just willfully ignorant.