Context:

The article in question was well sourced, factually accurate, and written by a well-renowned author and journalist whose work appears elsewhere too, regardless of which outlet published it.

Nonetheless, Jordan Lund is once again blindly trusting a pro-zionist conservative outlet masquerading as a bias and fact checker that nothing from anywhere that criticizes the fascist apartheid regime can be reliable 🤦

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    No, because if we allow one source that’s questionable, then the next time this comes up it will be “But, but, you allowed this other bullshit source, why not miiiiiiiine??!???” We aren’t opening that door.

    Holy slippery slope fallacy, Batman! 🙄

    Read what other people are telling you in this very thread, YDI.

    I have, and most either agree with me or disagree based on the irrelevant point you keep harping on.

    Rigidly dogmatic mods such as yourself is the reason why most people from other instances avoid .world when possible.