• Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m not surprised.

    All of those constructed languages were modelled after natural languages, either to give a tongue to some fictitious people (most of the listed) or to perform like an auxiliary language (Esperanto). So the difference between conlang and natlang here is just one of origin.

    In the meantime, those programming sets of instructions (Python, C, etc.) were created for something else, issuing instructions in code. On the very best you could analyse them as doing a fraction of what a language does, but in practice it’s something else entirely.

    • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I suspect their ultimate goal is to confirm or refute the common theory that there’s a general mental faculty for recursion that’s used both for natural language and for other recursive tasks (implying that language and recursive thought evolved together).

      • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        If that’s their goal then it was a really dumb idea to pick these conlangs. It simply won’t show any surprising data, since all of those languages implement recursion in one or another way.

        • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          all of those languages implement recursion in one or another way

          Yeah—Python and English are both recursive, so that doesn’t account for why the brain processes them differently. But they need to figure out what other feature does account for it—ideally by finding a pair of (probably artificial) languages that differ only in the exact feature which triggers the language network. Then they can figure out how that feature relates to recursion or any other mental abilities that might have co-evolved with language.