Summary

Canadian citizen Jasmine Mooney was detained by ICE for two weeks despite having a valid U.S. work visa. Stopped at the San Diego border, she was abruptly arrested, denied legal counsel, and held in freezing cells before being transferred to a private detention center.

She witnessed systemic inefficiencies, inhumane conditions, and detainees trapped in bureaucratic limbo.

After media attention and legal intervention, Mooney was released.

Her experience highlights the profit-driven nature of private detention centers and the broader failures of U.S. immigration enforcement under Trump’s administration.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The detail? That a visa is not the same as allowing/denying entry? That’s not detailed or complex information.

      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        From a high level, “There is a process by which undesirable people can be denied entry” covers both “A visa is required to enter the country” and “A passport and not being on a watchlist is required to enter the country.” So yes, you’re correct, no tourism visa is (currently) needed for Americans to enter Canada. Also, yes, the other guy is correct that mechanisms can relatively easily be put in place to stop undesirable Americans of a variety of types from entering the country.

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Mechanisms to deny entry is not the same as a visa. He thinks it is when he says “You do not have some kind of right to visit Canada just because you are American” and it’s not. Period. I can’t believe I need to have this conversation twice. I’m out.

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            You’re the guy who is saying Americans wouldn’t get work permits, yet a substantial number do every year. And while guards may not do that much, there are a lot of ancillary types who likely would. HR, facilities management, construction, security systems, and others I’m sure can and have opted to work in Canada at one time or other for a variety of reasons.

            So there, now you both can be wrong, too.

            • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              Why do I bother but fine

              At this point Canada should be playing hard ball. Ban all visas from anyone working for those companies, or anyone who delivers services to those companies for as long as they work for those companies. If they lie about who they work for, the ban is permanent and they personally are not allowed to set foot in Canada ever.

              If they currently work for that company, why would they get a work or study visa for Canada. His statement was those workers specifically, as long as they are currently working there. And if they stop working there to get another job or go to school, guess what they are no longer currently working there. (I wonder if this is where you be extremely pedantic and say there can be a small overlap where they work there but apply for a visa to go to school etc slightly before they quit.)

              Ok really I’m out.