CAVOK@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 5 days agoStonehenge isn't the oldest monument of its kind in England, study revealswww.livescience.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up176arrow-down11
arrow-up175arrow-down1external-linkStonehenge isn't the oldest monument of its kind in England, study revealswww.livescience.comCAVOK@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareB-TR3E@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·edit-25 days agoSo now that stonehenge is not needed anymore, let’s tear it down and build something useful instead.
minus-squareItsMyFirstDay@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 days agoHigh rise residential building? /s
minus-squareB-TR3E@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 days agoCertainly not. Luxury appartments make much more sense, economically.
minus-squareCrashumbc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 days agoFunny you mention that, at one point they were trying to build a highway next to it…
minus-squarescholar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 days agoThey were/are trying to build a tunnel next to it because drivers keep slowing down on the highway to look at Stonehenge
minus-squareebolapie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 days agoGreat place for a dollar general
So now that stonehenge is not needed anymore, let’s tear it down and build something useful instead.
High rise residential building? /s
Certainly not. Luxury appartments make much more sense, economically.
Funny you mention that, at one point they were trying to build a highway next to it…
They were/are trying to build a tunnel next to it because drivers keep slowing down on the highway to look at Stonehenge
Great place for a dollar general