fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Android@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前The difference of stealing yourself vs being stolen fromlemm.eeimagemessage-square97fedilinkarrow-up1317arrow-down132file-textcross-posted to: lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
arrow-up1285arrow-down1imageThe difference of stealing yourself vs being stolen fromlemm.eefne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Android@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square97fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
minus-squaresnooggums@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前Patents are about implementation, not concepts.
minus-square520@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前exactly! That tablet you saw in Star Trek TNG is not an implementation, as it’s not a real device.
minus-squaresnooggums@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前But is is a concept, which was what you appeared to be disagreeing with.
minus-square520@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 年前It is a concept indeed. When I said that, I merely provided commentary on how Apple was behaving, not what reflected reality. Apple weaponised their patents because they, or rather, Steve, believed they owned the concept.
Patents are about implementation, not concepts.
exactly! That tablet you saw in Star Trek TNG is not an implementation, as it’s not a real device.
But is is a concept, which was what you appeared to be disagreeing with.
It is a concept indeed. When I said that, I merely provided commentary on how Apple was behaving, not what reflected reality. Apple weaponised their patents because they, or rather, Steve, believed they owned the concept.