cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 30 days agoJunior Prompt Engineeringimagemessage-square53linkfedilinkarrow-up1748arrow-down18cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1740arrow-down1imageJunior Prompt Engineeringcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 30 days agomessage-square53linkfedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareOrvorn@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up82·30 days agoSomeone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a… code
minus-squareheavydust@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up38·30 days agoBut it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
minus-squarepeoplebeproblemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·30 days agoThat’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
minus-squareNatanael@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up21·30 days agoHow to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·30 days agoWe don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.
Someone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a… code
But it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
That’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
How to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
A codegrammar?
We don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.