• gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes it says that exactly, unless you think the “armed groups” shelled themselves.

      • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        You do realize that direction of the shelling wouldn’t be hard to determine? If you look at the side of a shelled building you know roughly which direction the shells are coming from. In your worldview OHCHR was duped by some elaborate conspiracy of repeated false flag attacks. That doesn’t even pass the sniff test. Also, why bring MH-15 into this? You cannot discredit my OHCHR source by bringing this up, what’s the connection there?

          • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think I can go any more official than the OHCHR, and I don’t think I can convince you of your good vs evil narrative with any source. People got shelled, it’s obviously implied they got shelled by the other side, and no theory to the contrary is put forward in the report.

            I’ll let you ponder this: This would be the first conflict in which one side commits all the war crimes. Even more curious, the side which commits no war crimes has a bunch of volunteer units literally using Nazi, SS and Bandera iconography. You know, the guys that marched hundreds of thousands of civilians into the woods and murdered them. Does that seem plausible to you?

            • WldFyre@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re talking about the side that has the Wagner group, right?