• downpunxx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    If she’s insured, she would lose her insurance, if her medical care is being provided at no cost from the state through medicare she would lose that, so, they really leave the person no choice. Show up and have this fucking thing removed, or lose any future medical care whatsoever. I mean, it’s still a choice, sure. No one forces anyone to eat or drink either, Steve.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s speculation. They seem like reasonable possibilities, but we don’t know because it wasn’t explained.
      At worse, all that is coercion. Well mostly just natural consequences really. Still not force.

      People can absolutely be forced to eat or drink. It’s been done in the past, when inmates go on a hunger strike. Half a dozen people strap them down, force a feeding tube down their throats. If lucky, they’d be sedated first.

      • FlowVoid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They aren’t reasonable possibilities, because Medicare covers everyone over 65 regardless of their medical history and ACA health insurance plans are required to enroll all applicants regardless of age or medical history.

        The latter can raise your premium if you smoke tobacco. That’s literally the only power of “coercion” they have available. All your other choices are off-limits.

    • FlowVoid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In the US, you can’t lose your health insurance based on your medical history.

      Pretty much the only way for an individual to lose their health insurance is by leaving their employer, if they have employer-provided insurance.

      Non-employer-provided plans are required to enroll anyone who wants enroll.