• thann@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    What if we fucked over all of the people that like our website to try and cater to people that don’t like it?

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Might? It already has.

    If shorts were simply a separate section of YouTube with all of its functionality, then that’s understandable. But as they stand, shorts are just YouTube with both reduced functionality (forced vertical aspect ratio, no seek bar, time limit) AND all of the existing flaws (bad recommendation algorithm, reposted content, etc. )

    Unless you are some kind of tech contrarian hipster, I don’t think there is one thing that YouTube shorts does better than TikTok, or heck, Instagram Reels.

  • waz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t mind grabbing my pitchfork and joining the “YouTube is already ruined party”, but two thoughts first:

    That headline is so deliberately vague. It could literally be one employee who said “eh, I don’t think YouTube shorts is a good idea”.

    The article itself doesn’t really give you any information that isn’t in the headline. It feels like an attempt to stoke anti-YouTube sentiment without providing any useful information.

    …okay, with that out of the way…

    Yeah, the current YouTube situation is pretty crap.

    • average_internet_enjoyer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah honestly these are some great points, and really it’s one of these reasons as to why I just dislike modern journalism today with the headlines as such.

    • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      It does cite internal metrics on ad revenues going down for three consecutive quarters due to lower potential to show ads in short videos compared to longer ones. It’s anonymous and doesn’t give solid figures but that’s what this article is about.

    • docmark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It’s the hustle culture that’s been ingrained into society at this point. Every industry has it now. Get in, make as much as possible (with little to no regard for others), get out, retire early.

      After that just become an influencer showing off your lavish lifestyle for brand sponsorships for even more money.

      Shit like Tiktok and Youtube Shorts are only making things worse, faster.

      • rexxit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Get in, make as much as possible (with little to no regard for others), get out, retire early.

        Arguably, this is what the American dream has become. It used to be we wanted middle class wealth, 2.1 kids, and a nice suburban house. But now all we want to do is sell out, retire, and never have to work again. I can relate, even if I lack the skills to play the game.

        That’s where we got antiwork, FIRE, etc. It’s true: nobody wants to work anymore. I sure don’t. Maybe we never did.

  • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m mostly fine with shorts, except for two things:

    1. You can’t move around in them, it’s either play or pause and repeat, which sucks (as shorts don’t have to be short…)

    2. On the homepage it doesn’t show who the short is from (which channel) without opening them

    • ObservantOcelot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      You can scrub around in them. Look for the red bar on the bottom after the short starts. You can tap and drag on it and a little red circle will appear that will show briefly after you release.

          • morrowind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            On the contrary, why bother hunting the down the slider for every different player when you could just use the system?

            Just curious, since I use the youtube slider like once a month.

            • JasSmith@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’m not the guy you asked, but I assume they do as I do. My system volume is calibrated for all the various applications I use day to day, including video conferencing. If I have to adjust that, it means everything else is the wrong volume. I’d rather modify YouTube to be the right volume than everything else.

              • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                This. My system volume is calibrated to be similar across all applications, games, etc. This means all apps are individually adjusted to reach similar volume level. Why should I have to mess with all of my other volumes just random manager at Youtube decided a volume slider on shorts isn’t necessary despite the site still using volume from regular videos where it can be adjusted? This isn’t an issue with any other app or platform. Maybe the last Youtube video I watched had overly quiet or loud audio compared to the norm and I either have insanely loud audio or I can’t hear a damned thing and I can’t fix it quickly like on any other Youtube page.

                Not everyone had a set of dedicated volume buttons, or wheel, etc. on their keyboard, so having to go into Windows settings or reach for a knob or button on the speakers themselves to adjust is a lot more than getting a slider like every other website in the world gives you.

    • visor841@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      You can’t move around in them, it’s either play or pause and repeat, which sucks (as shorts don’t have to be short…)

      Oddly enough, this seems to be a desktop limitation. I can scrub backwards and forwards just fine on my phone.

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Hopefully desktop PC hardware will become powerful enough to gain the ability to skip around in 30 second videos someday. I think I read that they expect them to be at parity with smartphone hardware in the next decade or two.

    • whiskers@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You can move around in them. Atleast on Android, there is a hidden red bar at the bottom which becomes visible if you pause the video.

    • TheAndrewBrown@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is a problem with all of these Tik Tok clones (and even Tik Tok let’s you do it for some videos). It’d so annoying to be watching a 45 second reel but if I miss something, I have to watch the whole thing again

      • Bjornir@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I have the exact opposite problem? I can skip around just fine in shorts, but can’t in reels… Is this due to A/B testing or am I dumb?

    • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I simply prefer TikTok for short form videos due to unique community and reasonably entertaining algorithm.

      I enjoy YouTube to the point of paying for Premium but I hate that my YouTube subscriptions feed on TV is littered with shorts that I have no way of disabling other than hiding them one by one (which I do to make a point).

      Suits at Google will try to shove it into everyone’s throats until they get bored and someone adds it to killedbygoogle.com so why would anyone even bother with it.

        • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m deep in Apple ecosystem and unfortunately this is not an option on Apple TV as far as I know.

            • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              In case of Apple TV, it’s the smoothest TV software experience, leaps and bounds above any ad-ridden smart TV or aging Nvidia Shield. I used Android TV and it’s just jank. For a time I had HTPC with Kodi too, it’s been relegated to hosting Plex and downloading stuff from Usenet. I enjoyed freedom to install anything but ultimately this didn’t outweight better audio codec support on Apple TV.

                • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Not sure what you’re making a stab at.

                  Apple software is obviously ad free and I have no problem with paying for YouTube Premium due to value it provides. Some good soul on Lemmy also recommended me a way to block sponsored content via isponsorblocktv which is a script that runs on my server and skips sponsored segments by reading YouTube app state and sending fast forward commands like a remote would.

      • asudox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s amazing how much social credit you possibly have. Xi Jinping is proud of you.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s also annoying that you can’t save them without using the hack where you change the URL.

  • Neptune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Using revanced. Disabled shorts. Watching these YT shorts & recommendations decays my brain cells

  • UnculturedSwine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I ducking hate how they removed functionality from them. They don’t show when they were posted, you can’t speed them up or slow them down, they repeat forever which is annoying if your going through the comments, the buttons being on top of the video obscures it, I can’t cast them to the TV from my phone (which is weird because it will play them if I select them directly from the TV app), it’s just a terrible UX overall. I never swipe up and I’m starting to get annoyed with how cumbersome it is to exit out to watch regular videos once I’ve watched the short I clicked on. I really don’t understand why YouTube wants to sacrifice everything that makes it great to be more like tiktok. If I wanted that format, I would go to tiktok.

  • Monomate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Perhaps it’s a little too late for YouTube to ride this trend. TikTok is even pivoting to long videos, as they know where the money is.

  • gummybootpiloot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t think it’s going anywhere. People get lost in shorts really quickly, especially on your phone. It’s the algorithm being able to decide who you are and how to get engagement out of you at a much faster rate then regular videos.

    Nobody asked for this, nobody wants it on youtube. But it keeps people on the platform longer and it feeds the algorithm fast. So it’s not going anywhere

  • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m not a fan of how little control there is over Shorts feeds and how they are set to repeat infinitely, but people are way too overly dramatic about Shorts. It seems like it’s culture shock more than anything.

  • mycorrhiza they/them@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    not only is the shorts UI shitty but the shorts themselves are often shitty imo, or at least the “scroll through shorts one at a time” linear format means you see a lot more videos you wouldn’t click on intentionally.

    • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      “No YouTube I do not want to watch Jordon Fucking Peterson. I will NEVER want that. Fuck all the way off.”

      I stopped watching shorts because of the unwanted boosts of fascist content.

      • jrubal1462@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Silver lining: It gave me the opportunity to “dislike” Jordan Peterson, which was not an opportunity I previously had.

        I mean, I guess I always HAD the option, but there’s something to be said about having somebody serve it up on a platter like that.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I literally could not understand what half the ones I saw were even supposed to be about last time I went on YouTube. Like they were just random people doing shit with no punchline or point.

    • cubedsteaks@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I hate that I get such random shit in my feed when I really only look at art videos - like my scrolling should be nothing but people drawing but random shit like slime videos or some ass hat and his kid.

      • chuckd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah YouTube really likes to inject videos you wouldn’t normally watch into your algorithm. It’s pretty annoying. I would never seek out religious videos, and never have on YouTube, yet they keep making their way into my feed. Even voting them down doesn’t seem to change the frequency.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The interface isn’t consistent between videos and shorts.

      You can rewind and fast forward videos on phones by double tapping the left or right hand side of the video, but doing that on shorts just likes it.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldBannedB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Senior YouTube staffers are reportedly worried that its TikTok competitor, Shorts, may eat away at its long-form content, which has for almost two decades been its primary bread and butter, according to The Financial Times.

    As FT points out, YouTube’s ad revenue, though recently improved, had been on a downward year-over-year slide for three straight quarters.

    YouTube is still figuring out how to reap more ad money from Shorts.

    Its long-form content lets it show more ads per video, but as short-form content gradually takes over, content creators themselves are uploading fewer long videos, FT writes, citing YouTube staff fretting about internal figures.

    Keeping up with that means adding features like AI summaries and NFL highlights, and even making compromises elsewhere in Google’s business to keep other industries happy and supportive of the service.

    It also means investing in Shorts’ creators and incentivizing them to make exclusive content for YouTube’s service.


    The original article contains 169 words, the summary contains 151 words. Saved 11%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.caBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Shorts: just a normal YouTube video but it’s too short to be useful, and most useful functionality had been removed.you can’t skip ahead or go back if you didn’t hear something, you just have to watch it again and again.

    Shorts is something a manager came up with. It doesn’t make it better, it makes it worse, but it also attracts more views, so profit!

    • scurry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The article indicated that, apparently, Shorts is even more unprofitable than regular YouTube. So they don’t even have that going for them

  • whelk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Every time I see the little “new content” blip next to someone I’ve subscribed to and it ends up being a short, I feel cheated.

    • shiii@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      yes i started unsubscribing some of the channels who publish daily shorts