• BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Spotify is not profitable right now; their current revenue doesn’t come anywhere close to covering their costs. The only reason they’re able to survive is investors holding on to the belief that, some day, it’ll be possible to actually make the numbers work.

        • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          The majority of their investors are record labels now, so there’s also an incentive to prevent competing streamers from taking Spotify’s position

      • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Musixmatch has a free, public database where lyrics are displayed. To contribute to the database, users can sign up and contribute lyrics, synchronizations, translations, and structuring to get points and move up levels. Musixmatch’s points have no redeemable value, but are instead a marker of a particular user’s contributions.

        So no?

          • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Spotify is receiving money for something they did not create.

            Neither the writers of the lyrics nor the fans who transcribed them get a cut.

            That is fucked up.

            • Sparky678348@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              It is fucked up that the fans who are transcribing do not get a cut, but it’s not like they were misled to believe they would make a cut before they started doing it. The people doing that are doing it out of a passion for the music.

              I’m not saying they shouldn’t be paid of course they should, if it was up to me I’d say make them all rich. I just think it’s a stretch to imply that Spotify is stealing anything here

              • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                I like stealing. According to my belief system theft is good.

                It’s the fact Spotify is charging users for something stolen is what I think is fucked.
                Something stolen should be freely shared.

            • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The writers almost certainly do get a cut. Musixmatch does not own the copyright to any of the lyrics, and as such, negotiated with the copyright holders in order to be allowed to store, display, and sell access to the lyrics. This almost certainly involved some amount of money changing hands.

              Spotify is paying money for access to the lyrics and using that as a feature in their product. A chunk of that money is almost certainly going back to the actual writers.

            • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Spotify is receiving money for something they did not create.

              Spotify are paying musixmatch for the lyrics.

                • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Irrelevant. It’s up to musixmatch to pay the creators or supplier of their content, not Spotify.

  • Space Sloth@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve never used the free tier on Spotify and I don’t understand how anyone can. The ads alone would make me throw off my headset in disgust. So yeah, not going to affect me, and I do enjoy reading the lyrics a lot.

    That said, I am experimenting with swapping over to Apple Music because I feel Spotify has become too expensive.

    • bblfrnz@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      The ads alone would make me throw off my headset in disgust.

      For a mobile, there is a modded apk,I’ve never heard ads there. For a PC, web player in Firefox with uBlock Origin, there are no ads at all there. The same goes for Tidal, I’ve never paid for these apps.

        • bblfrnz@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago
          1. spotx - well, I tried, but honestly, I don’t need one more app especially when everything works in the browser. Plus, I prefer portable setups and there’s no portable version of spotx, so, it’s pretty useless for me.
          2. It’s explicitly said on the Spowlo GitHub page that they use YouTube for downloading, so, there’s no way to get 320 kbps tracks or flacs. Instead, I’d recommend to try some Qobuz/Deezer-based solutions, there are quite a few of them there. Or use slavart or something like this, or good old soulseek, there’s even an Android client for it.
          • hunt4peas@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Does it convert them to 320kbps when I choose that quality? Because when I play those downloaded songs, it indeed shows as 320kbps.

            • bblfrnz@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s the question, because as far as I know, the highest ytmusic quality is 256 kbps. I would avoid using it

      • happyhippo@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Doesn’t solve the offline mode/taking a 13 hour flight use case, unfortunately.

        • bblfrnz@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, that’s very specific case to be honest. In that case you can just download whatever you want beforehand, from soulseek, for instance. Generally people make preparations in advance for such things.

        • evranch@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Zotify works very well at downloading Spotify lists, from playlists to whole discographies. You have to sort the output a little as you’ll often get multiple copies of tracks due to remastered editions, songs released as singles etc. But overall it’s an incredibly easy way to download music.

      • Space Sloth@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use an iPhone though and I’d prefer not to use YouTube for music, or anything, really.

        • bblfrnz@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh man, you shouldn’t be using iphone in the first place, the most useless device piracy-wise.

          • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Most people don’t pirate stuff on their phones. I use an iPhone and my hundreds of gigabytes of pirated stuff is available on my iPhone via plexamp/plex/etc.

    • rockhandle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      With xManager, the free tier comes quite close to premium. No ads, play whatever music you like. The only issues are lower sound quality & no downloads, which are really non-issues since you can just find other sources to download the music from, at flac quality

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The ads aren’t even for anything. It was just really patronising ads for Spotify Premium.

      Their business model is genuinely to just annoy you into paying.

          • Zitronensaft@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They were so much more expensive than Pandora when I tried them out and the free tier was too awful to want to reward them with my money, so I did pay but it went to a competitor. Their music recommendations were terrible compared to Pandora, too.

            I don’t use Pandora now though, they got bought by SiriusXM who I will never pay again after they made cancelation such a difficult process.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Spotify gives me ads and when I complain they tell me they’re not ads and that they’re offers lol. My only complaint.

    • satanicleftist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I recently flipped to apple music and apart from seeing a few songs missing on albums i don’t really listen to anyway, it’s only been an improvement. the lossless audio is quite nice

  • kworpy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just love watching everyone freak out about Spotify’s shitty business practices while I’m casually looping YouTube videos with an adblocker.

    • DaDragon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh, I switched to Spotify last year (++, of course) and there’s a lot to be said in favour of the Spotify algorithm when it comes to music recommendations, as opposed to YouTube.

            • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Have you checked out the made for you playlists? The Monday discover and Friday new music playlists have been key in how I find music the past like 10 years.

              • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                They don’t really work for me. I listen to different genres, different languages. Sometimes I only like a single song from an artist. My taste is weird. I usually discover new music organically through friends, or sometimes I’ll hear something playing somewhere and stuff.

                To me, it seems like the Spotify algorithm has a heavy bias towards newer songs, and also towards English songs. Both of those are a minority in my playlists, but somehow that’s all it recommends me.

      • Pleat1752@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Spotify algorithm pushes artists that pay them to push them to you. Get your recommendations via more organic means if you can. That means blogs, real people. Screw the spotify recommendation slop (and I say this as someone who has spotify premium.)

    • crab@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      YouTube sound quality is poor, and 99% of your bandwidth being devoted to video is wasteful. Just use SoundCloud or something. Better yet revanced patched YT music or xmanager Spotify.

      Edit: or better yet vimusic

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I finally got a sub to Apple Music when I learned I get lossless by default. Yummmmmm.

        I still hoard flacs, but Apple Music is dope.

        • crab@monero.town
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Waiting for Spotify lossless to ditch flacs, I really want to like Tidal but I’ve had major issues every time I try and stick with it.

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Spotify capping out at 192 was a nope for me hahaha. Someone on Lemmy mentioned AppMus had hi-rez lossless and regular lossless and I was like “yep done”

            I don’t like iTunes though, so on my computers it’s still flac o’clock.

      • totallynotfbi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        YouTube’s sound quality is comparable to Spotify’s - IIRC it’s 128kbps AAC versus 160kbps MP3. Also, a static video’s bitrate is around 300-400kbps, so you’re not wasting that much bandwidth

        • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          YouTube supports 160kbps opus, which should be pretty much transparent to our ears. But the audio is reencoded in the uploaded video, which then gets reencoded by YT again.

          These multiple lossy reencodes are probably why YouTube audio sounds worse then Spotiy. Artists upload there songs as lossless wav/flac, which the gets reencoded/compressed a single time.

          • totallynotfbi@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Didn’t know that YouTube had 160kbps audio… I checked a auto-generated upload on yt-dlp, and while it had an Opus stream, all of the audio streams were encoded at 128kbps.

            Both Opus and properly-encoded AAC audio should be virtually indistinguishable from the original source, but I do believe that Opus performs slightly worse in blind ABX testing. Again, you’d barely be able to tell the difference, so sound quality is basically the same.

            (As for encoding, I believe that YouTube uses the source audio if it’s already encoded as AAC, which most video editors do by default, and music distributors send the same lossless source to YouTube as they do to Spotify, so I don’t think re-encoding will make a difference)

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are some add-ons that turn off the video to avoid wasting energy.

      • DrQuint@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        But they still waste the bandwidth. The YouTube music either premium or revanced is still the “most economical” way.

    • cambriakilgannon@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      ublock origin blocks spotify ads well. I have found a lot of new artists using spotify, I avoided it for a pretty long time. When I find artists I like I usually buy their stuff on bandcamp cause i can get flacs

    • JCreazy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is what someone would say if they didn’t know any better.

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Using Spotify without premium, as Spotify offers it, is unusable. There might be other options than paying, but the vanilla Spotify experience is horrendous

  • lud@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It does make sense though since Spotify has to pay musixmatch for the service.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s true. But to be fair, I have added one song and synced a few. I didn’t do it because I wanted pay, I did it because I wanted the song’s lyrics to be on Spotify and on the app.

        They built a service and people seem to like it, so I don’t mind.

  • unfnknblvbl@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As a Spotify Artist, I bet I don’t even see a single hundredth of a penny for somebody paying extra for the lyrics, either…

    And even if Spotify did pay out extra for lyrics, I’m sure they’d find a way to screw my band out of royalties like they currently are anyway.

  • XYZinferno@lemmy.basedcount.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Music is one of the easiest things to pirate, so much so that I often forget me downloading flacs of the songs I listen to is supposed to be a no-no

    Between a flac playing app (Musicolet on Android and MusicBee on PC) as well as YT Music Revanced, things go smoothly

    • ArcRay@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only reason I don’t pirate music is because of discovery. I haven’t found a good way to find new music without using a streaming service. And then, I’m already using a streaming service, so why bother.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        This. Back when I was a spring chicken I had nothing better to do with my time than download random songs and albums. Ain’t nobody got time for that now.

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Streaming is fine to discover music, but you are not guaranteed that an album you like will be there for you the next time you want to listen to it. I do listen music in Spotify with a modded app, then I download the albums I liked. There are albums that I can’t listen to Spotify anymore, but I still have the audio files in my Subsonic server.

      • Jaded@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s different ways to automate it. There was a thread a while back where someone outlined their system. He kept the free Spotify account and had a script that checked it every week for his new recommended playlists, then it would download it automatically. He used an other software to host the library.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t get why anyone would use the free tier - not being able to choose songs would actually drive me insane, let alone the ads - but $11 monthly for essentially all the music anyone could ever want, plus solid playlists and recommendations, is a perfectly good value for me. Admittedly, I listen to music all the time and it’s a pretty big part of my life, so it’s an easy sell.

      I guess the free tier is still an improvement over radio, but regardless, producing and distributing music has costs, and I’m more than happy to pay for it. Given that Spotify isn’t even profitable, having lost about a billion dollars last year, I’m not sure how long this situation will last, but for the time being, I really don’t mind it.

      • Iceblade@lemdit.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        11$/month is 132$/yr. That’s a significant amount of money - about the same as my car insurance, broadband or phone bill. Putting a bunch of good music in a playlist and letting it roll is nice enough, especially with a 3rd party app to mute ads automatically. Besides, I don’t feel sorry for Spotify. The reason they’re hemorrhaging money isn’t a lack of profitability, but due to the massive royalties going to record companies.

        E: spelling

        • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          For the median American that works full-time, who earns around $56,000, the cost of Spotify is 0.2% of their income.

          Obviously everyone is in their own financial situation and for some people that will still be a burden. But for sake of comparison, in 1989, the average cost of cable TV was $18, and that’s of course in 1989 dollars. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to say that $11 for unlimited access to basically all music at any time is a pretty good value for the money.

          That said, if it is still onerous to someone, they’re obviously not in ideal circumstances and I’m really not gonna fault them for just pirating.

          • Iceblade@lemdit.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Swedish student (Median full-time wage here is 35’790 USD equivalents before an avg ~30% payroll tax), not taking loans, working part time teaching (and occasionally nursing) to make ends meet, so yeah, pretty cash strapped atm.

            Also, note that I already do have access to all the music in the world for free via youtube if I want something specific, or spotify for “radio style” infinite listening. 1440SEK/132USD is for added conveniences. No real need to pirate anything.

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If $132 a year for unlimited access to pretty much all the music in the world is a significant amount of money to you then Spotify is the least of your worries.

          Also your car insurance is $130 a year? What are you driving, a cardboard box and only in your living room? Your broadband only costs $132 a year?

          Press X to doubt.

          • Iceblade@lemdit.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Swedish student (Median wage here is 35’790 USD equivalents), not taking loans, working part time teaching (and occasionally nursing) to make ends meet, so yeah, pretty cash strapped atm.

            As for my car, not a cardboard box, but apparently there are 25 packs that cost as much as I bought it for five years ago. Just the mandatory traffic insurance, but it ends up at almost exactly same price.

            Also, note that I already do have access to all the music in the world for free via youtube if I want something specific, or spotify for “radio style” infinite listening. 1440SEK/132USD is for added conveniences.

    • chillbo_baggins@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s convenient. It’s where all my playlists are… that said, I’m open to alternatives?

      • Aopen@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago
        1. Listen on YT with adblock
        2. Download audio with Newpipe (OPUS 160kbps)
        3. Manage files with Amaze
        4. Listen with VLC

        I like this model, because YT has niche creators and I dont have to care about “Spotify changes X” news. Note: I have 1.5GB songs stored locally and listen ~30 minutes daily. I acknowledge discovering new songs is slower

      • Mothra@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can just use NewPipe background player. NewPipe lets you create and save playlists. No ads.

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well, piracy, but I’d say apple music or tidal, etc are even better than Spotify. There are services for transferring your playlists.

        Some are paid but if it’s just a one time transfer you could do them all in a free trial window.

      • krimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        download mp3s from youtube. Use rhythmbox on linux and metro on android. Metro even tries to find the lyrics online

          • genoxidedev1@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yup, can understand if your library is small, but for bigger libraries that’s definitely the most inconvenient thing you can do.

            Speaking from experience because I was basically forced to do it that way when I didn’t have regular internet access yet. My library was longer than 50 days. Just Hip-Hop alone was above 100GB.

            I used to find a shitton of music that way, but the inconvenience was real. Worst was music that I had to tag myself for example. Love mp3tag but that’s shit.

          • krimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I find it inconvenient to have limited skips and depend on one service to give you the song you want with the version you want. Also spotify ui doesn’t make sense to me, things just don’t work at times. Not to mention the ads.

              • krimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t like paid services, especially when you can get the same or most of the same stuff for free. It’s just not worth it for me, so that is my suggested alternative, doesn’t work for everyone.

                • zpoex@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Not really trying to argue with you but we were not discussing your preference haha😅 Just trying to say spotify premium is pretty convenient at a cheap price

                • can@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Unlike movie and tv streaming music streaming convenience is no contest for piracy if you’re an enthusiastic.

                  And this is coming from someone would download albums and discogrpahies, using programs to meticulously tag and organize them. I wish I had the time and patience now, and for the highlights of my collection I will, but with my music craving a music stream subscription is well worth it.

        • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mp3s from YT are garbage quality, it’s double transcoding from YT’s already low quality input.

          • edric@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah. If you’re gonna be downloading music from youtube, might as well just torrent flac or at least 320kbps quality instead.

          • Destragras@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can download audio from YouTube as 160kbps opus files, which aren’t lossless sure but it’s the highest quality you can get from YouTube if alternate means aren’t an option.

            • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              And that’s trusting that whoever uploaded the track had a good quality source. And it’s still double encoded.

              • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well if you save the opus or aac it’s only single lossy compression, not double unless the uploader used a lossy file as their input. But if that was the case, ripping mp3 would be triple lossy compression…

              • Pulp@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Any official uploads from recent years are going to be just fine. And if not then maybe their spotify upload is broken too

              • Destragras@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                For mp3 sure, but for opus standards 160kbps is great. I read that 128kbps is generally considered the most you need but 160kbps smooths over any artifacts, assuming the source file doesn’t have them.

            • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Then you probably don’t know any better because the vast majority of YT uploads are terrible quality. If you have anywhere near decent headphones/earbuds you can hear the difference immediately.

              • krimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well I’ve used spotify with and without headphones on popular phones, I can’t tell the difference from youtube. I usually download the music directly from the original uploader.

        • jochem@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was big into downloading before streaming services were a thing. Music streaming is one of the few services that’s totally worth my money: no hassle and I rarely have to resort to other platforms to find what I want (very different from video streaming, which totally sucks when it comes to that).

          • ribboo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            100% this. Paying $12 a month for basically all music I’ll ever want to listen to, is just an amazing deal. It’s so convenient. Felt the same when Netflix came about. But now when I need like 6 services, and there’s still lots not on them. Piracy is just so much more convenient.

            • can@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Felt the same when Netflix came about. But now when I need like 6 services, and there’s still lots not on them. Piracy is just so much more convenient.

              Yep, that’s the step they forgot: be more convenient than the pirates.

        • Psychonaut1969@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can I use any of those at the same time I am playing a game on ps3/ps4/ps5 they way they have integrated spotify? I use spotify because it is available on the devices I use. I would use bandcamp on them if it were an option as I love my collection there but, it is not available on many of the devices I use.

          • krimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            personally I don’t find that convinience worth it for the money/ads and other inconveniences, but that varies from person to person

        • glacier@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That is what I do, however it is very tedious when you want to listen to full albums, and add info to the file such as the album art and artist. Services like Spotify also sync your Library and playlist automatically across devices.

          • Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I made myself a python script to automatically tag and download entire albums from youtube at a time. I use syncthing to automatically sync it all. Quality isn’t the best but I can’t tell anyway so

          • DessertStorms@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fwiw, some youtube to mp3 converters will let you convert full playlists (don’t remember which, but there are a few).

    • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because it’s fantastic? Because it has almost all the music out there? Because it has an app on every device under the sun? Because it has amazing artist discovery? Because it lets you know of upcoming shows in your area?

      Why wouldn’t you use Spotify if you’re a music fan? I’ve got 200gb+ of music on my NAS that I use Plexamp to listen to but I still subscribe to and use Spotify more.

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m saying use one of the many streaming alternatives.

        Do people use “Spotify” as a generic term for steaming?

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Do people use “Spotify” as a generic term for steaming?

          No, they use it to mean streaming from Spotify…?

          You asked why people use spotify still, and I answered with many reasons why people specifically use spotify. Not every streaming service is the same, and spotify is widely regarded as the best.

    • SuiXi3D@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You nailed it. People’ve been using it for so long they don’t want to use any number of paid or free services to automatically move all their playlists and whatnot over to a different service.

        • iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Random usually sucks for everything that I’ve used.

          They should have two… True random and one that ‘radioifies’ your library.

    • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Basically exclusively because of Spotify Connect and the network effect. A lot of the music I listen to isn’t even available on Spotify.

      I prefer Deezer’s recommendation algorithm. I don’t have experience wity other streaming services.

    • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you have an eclectic music taste and don’t spend your life next to a computer, there’s practically no other option

      • rockhandle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tidal, Deezer, Qobuz, Funkwhale, Apple Music, Youtube Music, just to name a few. Spotify has no shortage of competition.

        • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My point is there’s little actual difference between them. Identical services provided by greedy corporations with shitty track records

          • rockhandle@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You said there’s no other option, I just listed some options. Also Funkwhale is decentralised, there’s no corporation backing it. Ofc, you can also just download the music you like.

            • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              😂 practically no other option, my friend. Haven’t heard of Funkwhale though, sounds interesting. And no, as I mentioned in my first comment, downloading isn’t feasible for people with eclectic tastes cuz I just can’t keep up with my spontaneous “need” to listen to that one album that hasn’t even crossed my mind in 20 years

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Apple music, Tidal, etc.

        Spotify is funding military AI tech. That’s enough for me. I’m on android but I’d still rather use Apple Music, plus they pay artists slightly more, and tidal pays more than them.

        • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I hate to tell you but everyone is funding scary military tech, even if you’re not an American tax payer. If you’ve flown on a Boeing plane, used Microsoft software, worn Oakley sunglasses… all that revenue goes to companies who do or support that research

            • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean I just named some of them, my point is you can’t avoid funding the military unless you live under a rock. Such is the military industrial complex

  • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Solid business decision by Spotify here, I support this move. I’ll probably switch over to them from YouTube music.

    • butter
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know right. What’s Spotify’s goal with this move

        • butter
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So someone can ignore the ads, ignore not being able to chose a song, and ignore no download. But having to open musixmatch in a separate app is the straw that broke the camels back

          • TheMadnessKing@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The idea of suddenly having something taken away fro you really triggers people.

            If they had introduced as premium from start, then no would have cared about it.

          • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It seems they were right going by how upset people are in here. Many of these people that are carrying on like spoiled children will no doubt subscribe to premium now.

      • sysgen [none/use name,they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The goal is that now that they’ve been caught pirating lyrics, they have to pay MusixMatch for their lyrics, perhaps on a per request basis, so they lose money by making it available.

  • GeekFTW@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Still working for me with just the basic bitch plan on the web/desktop.

    That being said: Fuck you Spotify lol

    Edit: fuck GadolElohai and CybranM too ya low expectation having downvoting motherfuckers lol