Politics have consequences. When elected politicians vote to arms ongoing genocide, people die. When elected politicians vote to deny people healthcare, people die. Politics and its consequences is inherently violent. dennis. If you want nonviolence take up rattan basket weaving

  • if violence has no place in our political system, then we should completely demiltarize, right? and cops should be disarmed. that’s some big savings right there we can put into healthcare, housing and food access right?

    oh, you just mean workers shouldn’t be allowed to do defend themselves from the structural violence of capitalists and their attack dogs, which should continue to enjoy the lion’s share of budget line items with bipartisan support. got it.

  • DogThatWentGorp [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    22 days ago

    “The Fourth of July commemorates the start of which war, again?”

    Favorite thing to say to myself in the shower when I have this imaginary argument. It’s gonna be super cool when I fumble it in practice.

  • tombruzzo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    22 days ago

    Libs don’t realise violence is built into the system and happens everyday. They don’t realise violence is often the only way to undo these unjust systems. And they think you can over turn things operating within a system where the oppressors have a monopoly on violence and decide who gets to use it

  • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    22 days ago

    Liberals are much worse than actual pacifists because they make tons of exceptions whenever it’s systemic violence conducted by a bourgeois state, which is literally the worst time to make exceptions.

    I think part of the 10% of Americans who never approved of Bush included some of those old hippie cranks who I respect infinitely more than the people who style themselves as “nonviolent,” while opposing every war except the current one. Possibly a hot take but simply being like, “violence is bad” consistently, with zero broader understanding of politics and no consideration of material conditions, even when the news says otherwise and even when the state or the “good guys” are doing it, is enough to make you more correct about geopolitics than the vast majority of Americans.

    • Hestia [she/her, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      22 days ago

      My problem with pacifism is even if you’re unwilling to commit violence upon others, they are still willing to commit violence upon you. Some people’s hearts cannot be changed and we give those people the wall

      • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        21 days ago

        I used to be more sympathetic to the concept until I studied more of the history of countries outside the imperial core, which disavowed me of any notions of “the good guys always win,” or that violence towards nonviolent movements always results in public support.

    • BeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      22 days ago

      By the same token, I have infinitely more respect for people who oppose both Russia and Israel than those who oppose Russia while making excuses for Israel.

  • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    22 days ago

    Lol we vaporized tens of thousands of Japanese civilians and imbued the bones of the survivors and survivors’ children with cancer and use the bases we built on those islands to menace Korea and China

    • OrionsMask [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      This is why anything that comes out of the mouth of an American about non-violence is bullshit. They make jokes about one of the most barbaric acts ever committed to this day, they never found any remorse. That moment contributed heavily to allow American crackers and their empire to become what they are today. If the US could have been nuked in retaliation in 1945, we might have seen a more humbled and cautious US emerge, instead of the obnoxious child bully they became.

      • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        21 days ago

        What’s weird is I can excuse more the people that actually dropped the bomb more than I can tolerate people who make up post-facto excuses for dropping the bomb. If it was 1945 and facing the slog of assaulting Japan and not knowing all the facts of a new thing I kinda get it. Even the people who set out to do evil like use it as a demonstration to threaten the world with. Because their whole idea was “if this works.” If. They didn’t truly know.

        Meanwhile in 2025 the people with access to all the facts who say it was a good thing are just hideous. They gross me out so much more.

  • Omegamint [comrade/them, doe/deer]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    22 days ago

    Libs believe in the magical liberal state which actually does not utilize it’s monopoly of violence. If libs were principled they would actually be anarchists, but instead I have no respect for them.

    • MizuTama [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 days ago

      I don’t really talk politics into back the blue support the troops rhetoric actually has repeatedly stunlocked me when reading stuff liberals write

  • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    21 days ago

    Remind them that not having free healthcare is an act of violence.

    Remind them that not having a home to live in is an act of violence.

    Remind them that sacrificing one minority group to appease a political opponent is an act of violence.

    Remind them that being able to be fired from a job for any reason or no reason is an act of violence.

    Remind them that having a paycheck that can’t pay rent, groceries, utilities and medicine is an act of violence.

    • OldSoulHippie [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 days ago

      All of this is true, but I can already hear the lib reaction. 3/4ths of it will be hand waived away as “not violence” because the direct action doesn’t cause any direct physical harm in their eyes. The remaining 1/4 they might sheepishly admit is violence but “it’s just how things are”

      • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        The libs have their permanent professional counter-revolutionaries to nudge things in a direction more favorable to their goals.

        curry-space

    • Griffus@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      US workers rights are mediaeval. Unionise and battle the elite for the best of everyone like the sivil world did a century ago. Get with the program of human dignity.