• schnokobaer@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, I still think it’s a great mechanical interface, if not the best. Would’ve been great if rather than killing it, regulatory bodies had forced USB to adopt the lightning design for the C type.

    • JCreazy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lightning doesn’t have near the capabilities of USB C. Lightning had its time but it’s pretty clear that USB C is superior.

      • schnokobaer@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lightning doesn’t have near the capabilities of USB C. … pretty clear that USB C is superior.

        Are you talking about the capabilities of the USB protocol 3.x, or the mechanical design like I was? I don’t know a single property where the mechanical design of USB is superior to Lightning, but I’m ready to be enlightened.

        • Paulemeister@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          For example having 3x the pins is a big plus. I don’t know why you are so focused on not including the protocols a port can use. Apple will most likely use USB to make connections between PCs and their Phones possible. And you have to have connectors capable of carrying the signals for those protocols.

          The huge speeds of USB 3.0 (USB 3.2 Gen 1x1) and up are because of added twisted pairs carrying the signals in duplex (Plus a new USB A connector). Anything above USB 3.2 (USB 3.2 Gen 1x2 and USB 3.2 Gen 3 2x2) needs to use USB-C because the older USB-A Connector doesn’t have enough pins to allow a connection to a cable with 4 twisted pairs (plus one for backwards compatibility).

          I think the lighting connector is enough to allow for a USB 3.0 connection, but you would have to switch the signals after it comes out of the port somehow, as the 3rd pair is not used during FullSpeed (I think there’s an adapter that does this)

          Even if they don’t use USB and develope their own protocol, it’s gonna benefit from more parralel connections

        • Enkrod@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The mechanical design was patented by apple, THEY decided that others were not allowed to use it (unless they pay).

        • png@artemis.camp
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          One area where that is the case is the clamping mechanism. With USB-C, the moving parts/springs, which are the part of a connector that is most prone to failute are in the cable, which is both easier and significantly cheaper to replace than the charging port/device.

    • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think this design could have work for USB 3.1 and more, even apple put USB -c as PD on there MacBook because it can deliver more watt (I think)

      but yeah it was much better design than micro usb