• poor leftists talk about poverty, labor aristocrats get uncomfortable and insist that sociological classes aren’t materialist. “all that matters is that we’re working class - we’re all in this together”

  • black leftists talk about racism, whites get uncomfortable and insist that they’re not personally part of the problem. “we mustn’t allow the bourgeois to divide the proletariat along racial lines - we’re all in this together”

  • female leftists talk about patriarchy, men get uncomfortable and insist that it hurts them too. “this men vs women stuff is reductive anyway - we’re all in this together”

  • third world leftists talk about imperialism, americoids get uncomfortable and insist that red white and blue lives matter too. “what happened to the international working class - we’re all in this together”

you don’t have to invite yourself to every form and experience of oppression. anyone with a baby’s consciousness of intersectionality ought to be capable of admitting when they have privilege

  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    I still love the song but the lyrics were directly about being “tricked” into a public mental health institution, the kind that ceased to exist for the most part after Reagan’s “reforms.”

    • ped_xing [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      That seems like a stretch. I highly doubt public mental health facilities have ever been synonymous with intoxicating opulence.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I highly doubt public mental health facilities have ever been synonymous with intoxicating opulence.

        They weren’t, but they still existed for those in dire need of a place to stay and access to medication.

        They don’t have to be “opulent” to be that and closing pretty much all of them left every single person kicked out of them on the street, many of them permanently. That’s a little worse than “not opulent.”

        • ped_xing [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          Kicking a lot of mentally ill people out onto the streets was an atrocity, no argument from me there.

          I’m arguing that Hotel California being about mental hospitals doesn’t make sense. There are so many lines that run counter to that interpretation:

          There she stood in the doorway

          The . . . intake nurse?

          Her mind is Tiffany-twisted/She got the Mercedes Benz

          Even if the staff can afford some luxuries, it doesn’t seem like something they’d discuss with a patient.

          They livin’ it up at the Hotel California

          Said nobody about an inpatient mental health facility ever

          Mirrors on the ceiling/The pink champagne on ice

          A hazard and contraband that would be immediately removed

          And the part that might work,

          You can check out any time you like/But you can never leave

          really only half works. The “never leave” part works, sure, it was involuntary hospitalization, but how can you explain “check out any time you like?” Letting patients fake a check-out just seems like torture.

          • TankieCatgirl [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            I always thought it was about drug addiction, specifically in the music industry, which lines up a bit more with the things you pointed out imo. And I heard that checking out was a euphemism for suicide.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I’m not 100% certain on my take, but some of your attempts to shoot it down are kind of Reddit-tier pedantic. “They livin’ it up” can definitely be sarcastic or even medicated altered states of being, for example.

              • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                I already gave the example of “livin’ it up” being taken so directly and literally that there’s a willing refusal to see the possible interpretations of the line as sarcasm regarding the conditions of the people mentioned, or as an altered state of consciousness from psych medications.

                • TankieCatgirl [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Or, he could be neurodivergent and tends to take things literally. Just because someone interprets something different than you (particularly something as subjective as song lyrics) doesn’t mean you have to go straight to insults.

                  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    I had no such intention and I find it a stretch to see pedantic behavior as fundamentally neurodivergent.

                    Saying that saying someone is being pedantic is ableist but then giving a pass to what I said supposedly “not making sense” sounds selective to me, like you already had a chip on your shoulder about this.

                    This is becoming too heated for me to meaningfully continue it so I need to stop here. It’s not worth it over song interpretation.