thehatfox@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoOpinion: The Copyright Office is making a mistake on AI-generated artarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up147arrow-down126cross-posted to: aicopyright@lemm.eetechnology@beehaw.org
arrow-up121arrow-down1external-linkOpinion: The Copyright Office is making a mistake on AI-generated artarstechnica.comthehatfox@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square39fedilinkcross-posted to: aicopyright@lemm.eetechnology@beehaw.org
minus-squareBURN@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoThat’s not my problem Art is not generated by machines. Nothing of value is lost.
minus-squareFaceDeer@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoAh, so you meant “there’s not a single downside to me.”
minus-squareBURN@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 year agoNothing of value is lost. Generative AI does not create anything new. It’s exclusively a benefit to artists
minus-squareFaceDeer@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoNothing of value to you is lost. We already know you don’t care about other people, no need to keep repeating that.
That’s not my problem
Art is not generated by machines. Nothing of value is lost.
Ah, so you meant “there’s not a single downside to me.”
Nothing of value is lost. Generative AI does not create anything new.
It’s exclusively a benefit to artists
Nothing of value to you is lost. We already know you don’t care about other people, no need to keep repeating that.