• ThetaDev@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do they now have additional USB ports on the back side? Or do you refer to having USB modules plugged in?

    • Abbrahan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      They were talking about the usb modules. The back two on either side (the ones closest to the screen) have an issues where the USB 4 Type C to USB A adapter is not fully going to sleep when nothing is plugged in. So ArsTechnica’s reviewer most likely had one of the USB A modules plugged into those two USB 4 ports which causes their apparent poor battery life.

      • The Hobbyist@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Indeed. On both the picture at the top of the article and at the bottom, do we see them having the USB-A expansion card in the slot closest to the screen. If that’s how it was configured for the battery test, it would show battery life in a non-optimal configuration.

        Edit: this is only an issue on the AMD board.

        • Abbrahan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I believe Framework said they are looking into fixes for this issue, either with firmware patches or if neccesary a hardware revision of the USB A module. Current workaround is just to not put USB A into those two back slots.