And does this unfairly paint them as less agreeable than they would be if you presented what they said with a normal voice?

  • Sdot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s childish and patronising. Do if you want, but you’ll look worse for it.

  • OrderedChaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It shows how you feel of their opinion and sheds doubt on your interpretation of the situation. And also sways the listener to your opinion. It’s best to share facts without the emotion.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 months ago

    TIL doing a pattern of capital and lowercase letters means you’re doing a dumb voice. Didn’t know that until looking at the replies, now I feel like I have a lot of stuff to change on my countless profiles.

    To answer the question, I don’t think so. I don’t use the dumb voice just for people who disagree with me, it would have to actually be dumb, like the teacher who thought special ed gym class was better for me because that’s where people go who aren’t social enough with their classmates (and then you get to the class and wonder what the logic is because you solved a people problem by subtracting the people).

  • Sabre363@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Context is always important. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, and doing this is a good way to express your opinion about someone else’s opinion. Just remember, it’s easy to sound like an insufferable twat when done poorly.

  • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    What is your goal? To debate (convince) or to humiliate them?

    If you do it in real life in a debate with your adult friends, you will be seen as a failure. It’s immature and speaks more of your weaknesses. Because you’re actively mocking the person, as opposed to attempting to have a conversation.

    Doing it in real life to mock someone is acceptable. You’re not having a debate or conversation. Your goal is to insult them.

    • chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      To be fair, if emotion isn’t involved, that’s basically just a sign of indifference. You owe it to yourself and your “opponent” to actually care about whatever it is you’re discussing. What truly matters is understanding and prioritizing the why behind your feelings and honoring that, regardless of whatever random impulse those feelings are currently bringing about.

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Of course it is. But people will generally go along with it so long as what you’re saying agrees with what they think.

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Weird I’ve never done this, my inner monologue has one voice. Imo it’s a sign of immaturity.

    • Meho_Nohome@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      My inner monologue does lots of voices. It does a great Christopher Walken. It also does a good Bill Cosby, especially when talking about pudding. I get offended when it uses Cosby’s voice because he’s no longer acceptable in society. My inner dialogue can’t keep up with changing times. It’s still saying “Where’s the beef”.

  • JCreazy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I think that’s the point. Mocking the person fire sharing their dumb idea.