• Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes… they’re number 2 and 3… Except between position 1 and 2 is literally a 20x difference. If #1 is held by pitbulls by such an astounding lead that they 20x ahead of #2… You don’t look at #2 and #3 as contenders.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes… pits accounts for 66% and Rottweilers are ~10%… And Shepherd’s are ~5%. When First places is 4.4 times further ahead than second and third place combined… It’s pretty safe to make the claim they’re worse. And it ends up being a very logical claim to hold. So thanks for agreeing.

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              LMFAO. You’re the kind of person who blames individuals for global warming when it’s companies that are fucking up the environment aren’t you?

              You seem to miss the point that when one population is distinctly attributable to the VAST MAJORITY of the problem… It’s that Population that should be held accountable. Dog deaths could become a statistically irrelevant number with n<100 (each death would still be sad, but it would be exceedingly rare). Pitbulls are in the way of that.