• SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Speaking of, Hamas has over 1MM liters of fuel, and ample supplies of fresh water, that they refuse to distribute in Gaza. They also refuse to return hostages, which would also immediately lift the siege.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-says-gaza-photos-show-half-million-liters-of-fuel-held-by-hamas/

    Edit to add:

    The reason they stockpiled so much is their tunnel ventilation systems run on generators (which is also the reason Israel is trying to deny them fuel, because tunnel fighting is a nightmare and that’s what is coming)

    https://m.jpost.com/israel-news/article-770123

    Here’s a great video with more info https://www.youtube.com/live/xfc0nHLgDuY?si=8P-MddAIFXsFt-mA

    • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Terrible thing Hamas has done

      Hamas doing something horrible doesn’t make it OK to starve the entirety of Gaza

      Terrible thing Hamas is doing

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not unreasonable to expect an enemy government to feed their people, rather than your country

        • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hamas doing something horrible doesn’t make it OK to starve the entirety of Gaza

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I mean we can copy the same comments to another over and over all day if ya want.

            I’ve got 3 hrs til my plane boards

            FWIW I’d strongly support a heavily-militarized aid station set up in the south but you know as well as I do that people would still blame Israel for Hamas gunning down people headed south.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yes. Hence “heavily militarized.”

                You seem to think this crossing is like, a single street. It is not. It’s a misleading name the same way the “Palestinian refugees camps” are really modern cities of 100k people with permanent, concrete buildings the same as any other city.

                • Sparlock@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Uh no I don’t think that it’s a street. How does anything you said even address the point i made that Israel keeps bombing the crossing?

                  Oh right it didn’t.

                  Care to try again and actually address the point?

                  Or you can just talk about some unrelated shit and try to deflect once more.

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Sometimes there are Hamas terrorists in places killing people and those people get bombs dropped on them. That’s the “bombing the crossing” thing you’re discussing.

                    Your assumption is that this means Israel is targeting civilians or that it is impossible to do this while providing aid in the same geographic area. This is easily proven false because aid trucks, foreign nationals, and lots of people are in those areas and are not dead - because those areas are large.

                    This makes me believe you are totally ignorant of how the geography actually works, which I am still convinced of.

                    A heavily militarized aid area would not be enterable by terrorists and thus is a safe haven for providing aid.

                    Not sure why you’re bringing the attitude when you’re the one who doesn’t understand the situation and is just parroting shit blindly.