• agegamon@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly the range isn’t even an issue. Yes they did something wrong, but IMO in terms of misleading customers it’s not at the top of the list long list. They have all this horseshit about “full self driving” that they stick all over their website with pretty animations and graphics.

    Then you actually read into it and the fine text says “oh by the way, it’s technically just a slightly suicidal/homicidal level 2 ADAS that nobody has signed off on, and that Tesla can yank it out from under you at any time, and thst WILL be conveniently forgotten about and valued at $0 if you decide to trade in your car with tesla, but it’s cool brosky just do it for the likes”

    • lemillionsocks@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of the venture capitalist driven industry has been fueled by an ask for forgiveness not permission move fast and break thing philosophy tesla included. It’s about time the law start catching up with them instead of caving to their will because its a TOTALLY NEW idea because an app is involved.

      • david@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. Unfortunately “move fast and break things” has some disadvantages when it comes to driving in traffic.