• maegul@hachyderm.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    @ajsadauskas@aus.social @ajsadauskas@lemmy.ml @poVoq @AussieWirraway

    Thanks! I appreciated the safety section … seems quite good!

    As a Melbournian, I’ve always been kinda against the love affair the city seems to have with Trams. Largely because of their lack of flexibility and the way they essentially pollute streets with overhead power lines. Buses are the obvious alternative to Trams for inner city PT, so it pleases me to see this.

    • AJ Sadauskas@aus.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      @maegul @ajsadauskas@lemmy.ml @poVoq @AussieWirraway It is possible to do trams without all the overhead wires.

      In Newcastle, the trams are powered by a battery. They charge by raising a pantograph up to touch a steel bar at each tram stop: https://youtu.be/yFQRo3I15fY

      In Sydney, along George St and Circular Quay, the trams are powered by a third track embedded in the roadway. So, again, no overhead wires in this part of the network: https://youtu.be/DdiZ3UTa4g4

      So yes, trams without overhead wires can be done.

      Even if Melbourne didn’t move to a different power system, the city could reduce the amount of overhead wires by:

      a) Giving trams their own right of way in the middle of the road (rather than sharing their lanes with cars), and
      b) Hanging overhead wires from poles in the middle of the road (as happens currently on Burwood Hwy) rather than from poles on the side of the road.

      Dedicated lanes would also make a world of difference in terms of travel times, frequency, and preventing trams from bunching up.