• Emerald@lemmy.emerald.show
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I replaced my old Intel Core i7 HP ProLiant server with an Odroid M1 (ARM Based) and it consumes 2 watts compared to 72 that the Intel Server did.

    The only thing I can’t do with it is my Minecraft server, it runs all else perfectly. Even the Lemmy instance of this account is powered by the same server! And what’s more it basically runs for free, as solar generates enough power for the server to consume, even when it’s cloudy.

    Yes, I believe Intel should be afraid.

      • beefcat@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        that must be the reason seeing as java is available for just about everything these days

        modern arm socs are impressive but i seriously doubt that 2 watt chip is beating the 75 watt chip it replaced

        • Emerald@lemmy.emerald.show
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The server was a second hand server that has 32GB RAM and 2 i7 CPU’s, it was made in 2015 so quite old. The Odroid has only 8GB of RAM but for my purposes that’s enough, and given the power it saves it’s absolutely a bargain!

          If I ever need this much memory again I can just temporarily spin up something more powerful, for all other 24/7 tasks I can keep up the efficient ARM server.

          • beefcat@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            it’s great that the new machine suits your needs with so little power. whatever gets the job done with the least energy and cost is almost always the best option.

            we are just questioning whether its performance is truly comparable with the old one. because arm cannot replace x86 on performance per watt alone, many applications need more performance regardless of wattage. i think your old machine was overkill for your use case

            • Emerald@lemmy.emerald.show
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah makes sense! It probably doesn’t although I have no benchmarks to prove it, it just is enough for me. I know this much though: even if the x86 server had the same specs (ram, GHz) as the arm version it likely still draws more power

        • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well, Java can call into native code. I’m pretty sure Mojang isn’t doing that sort of thing, but I wasn’t entirely sure they weren’t depending on a subset of the JVM or a native library that is defacto standard in the x86 world.

          • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Programs like Box86 and Box64 csn efficiently make native calls work out if there are native equivalents available, and there’s always qemu-static if that fails.

            I don’t remember Minecraft server edition relying on native binaries, but it’s been a while since last ran it, maybe Mojang changed it.

            • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t remember Minecraft server edition relyint on native binaries, but it’s been a while since last ran it, maybe Mojang changed it.

              Same, and it sounds like it doesn’t… I just wasn’t sure. You can also run into things like “I never realized this was using… glibc… which is on every x86 Linux computer.” I don’t think that’s happened either though.

              Programs like Box86 and Box64 csn efficiently make native calls work out if there are native equivalents available, and there’s always qemu-static if that fails.

              Interesting, good to know

      • Emerald@lemmy.emerald.show
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah it’s mostly performance related. I have like 10 different websites running all at once, and while CPU and RAM aren’t 100% all the time, with a heavy load I don’t have enough free to do it

    • Jears@social.jears.at
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I run my lemmy instance on a pine64 quartz64 which uses an rk3566. It runs really well and power consumption is totally negligible. Didn’t notice any increase in my power bill since it’s been running.