• AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As an American, fucking good.

    I know this is a horrendously unpopular belief in the selfish, sociopathic civilization we’ve made, where we’re comfortable starving our own citizens for not being good enough capital batteries, but I don’t equate amassing the most capital as making you the most right or most good in a conflict.

    I in fact feel less safe that the biggest guns against humanity’s heads are controlled by the wealthiest, most sociopathic human nations.

    Capitalists are very clear about how little human life means to them in the face of new profit opportunities.

    It’s a small blessing that throwing endless money at war doesn’t necessarily decide every battle.

    • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The United States was already designing military systems designed to prevent drone attacks. We expected those types of attacks in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria but it did not occur.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good for Ukraine. Of course, most of those $2M tanks have been rusting away for years. Russia’s army was in mothballs before this.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    A typical FPV weighs up to one kilogram, has four small engines, a battery, a frame and a camera connected wirelessly to goggles worn by a pilot operating it remotely. It can carry up to 2.5 kilograms of explosives and strike a target at a speed of up to 150 kilometers per hour

    Somehow I don’t think these drones are capable of 150kph/93mph