It feels like it’s been since “I’m a Little Bit Country” that Matt and Trey really pulled a one off on both “sides”. So much hate and love from both conservatives and liberals, wherever you look. They absolutely nailed this episode and I hope it opens our eyes to the reality of culture war bullshit.
But the best part of the episode was the labor/tech/billionaire plot. The dumbing down of society, flipant billionaires doing fuck all they want, AI taking over white collar jobs, college education being bullshit, trade work holding more value… It’s a sub plot that is not political but the most important satire that they have produced. The Twitter freaks are arguing over “woke” and missing the entire fucking point!
Enough with the “both sides” stuff. The A-plot of the episode was designed to poke fun at “woke casting” while simultaneously making the whole argument look ridiculous, and it did this very well. I don’t think this was written to portray the attitudes of “both sides” of the casting argument, and it would have been way less funny if it did. In the course of poking fun at “woke casting” it seems to have bothered a lot of socially/politically progressive people in the same way “Buddha Box” and “Board Girls” did because they don’t think the issue is appropriate for satire, which is partially what makes it so funny in the first place.
South Park has always taken aim at the moral/social standards Americans take for granted, it’s just that whatever ‘political correctness’ means to people has become much more prominent as a moral/social standard in many parts of the country and in the public discourse than it was 20-25 years ago. It’s ok to make fun of the same way it was ok to have an episode where a statue of the Virgin Mary bleeds out her vagina, and Matt and Trey don’t (and shouldn’t) create content that “treats both sides equally” because 1) that wouldn’t be funny if it’s forced and 2) there are usually more than two sides to most social/political issues anyway.
“I’m a Little Bit Country” was really the exception to the rule in that it was explicitly built around making a “both sides” point, but in general the show is great because it doesn’t pull its punches on its principle targets by weighing it down with trying to develop a “both sides” approach.
Isn’t that literally what they’re talking about? You just made an argument about how they don’t play both sides then in the same argument, provided an example of them playing both sides