Like, the site owners/employees/admins/mods are the only ones who choose what to post(and hopefully not extremely bias and a good spread of topics), but the users can still upvote/downvote the post as well as comment and all that?

I like the aggregation mark down style of these sites, but I am not sure about the curation being purely user based. I am curious if the users having a large majority control of the curation hurts the quality, and I’d like to see comparisons if they exist.

  • Uncle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    honestly, sounds like you are looking for a comment section on a news network to me. maybe im missing something.

    • mob@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess kind of.

      But the idea would still be an aggregation of different sources, but mainly curated by a select few, rather than the full population. Users would still influence post order and all that.

      Ohwell, I didn’t think it’d exist, or be well known if it does, but was just posting to see if anyone here knew of anything.