• 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ok so you’re saying that you need to outright lie to get people to side with you?

    That makes you sound like a politician, not a human rights advocate, but sure

      • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        How about you address the fact that you’re saying that telling the truth would distract from the point instead of pulling up distractions? Sounds like whataboutism to me

        • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Let me put it another way.

          There’s 4,947,342.562 kinds of people in the world: those who obsess over needless numeral exactitude when faced with a rhetorical argument, and those who don’t.

      • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exact and false numbers given as proportions aren’t hyperbole, they’re misrepresentations, ie lies.

        • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Say you’re in a room”

          It’s literally at the start of the post. Anyone who has eyes and can read now understands this is hypothetical

            • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s a hypothetical. Not misinformation. It’s a hypothetical argument meant to make a philosophical point, not to be a case study on sociological statistics

              You fucking dipshits getting hung up on the wrong thing means you don’t have enough brain cells to process the argument at hand.