• AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This thread started because you asked someone to name a single nonviolent revolution. Such a thing cannot possibly exist, especially considering your inexplicably broad definition of that word.

    You cannot seriously equate shooting someone with taking a child’s dessert away, simply because you consider them both to be violence. Considering this I’m a bit confused as to your point.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That was my point.

      Point to where I ever said or implied such a thing, please you don’t actually have a point without a quote you can reference.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I provided a statement of fact, if that’s stirring the pot to you then consider it stirred.

          Not at all, I’ve responded in good faith, why you’re upset is beyond me.