I was talking to a friend of mine and we got into the discussion of the importance of O-Lines. I’m of the opinion that an amazing top-5 O-Line props up nearly any QB enough to be a great QB. He’s of the opinion an amazing top-5 QB helps inflate O-Line stats.

Who is right - or is it a little of both?

  • ThrowTheBones93@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    2012 Vikings. Peterson MVP season where he fell nine yards short of the single season record. O-line was a big reason for that.

    Ponder threw for less than 3k yards and had 18 TDs to 12 INTs. That’s terrible considering teams were stacking the box on AD.

    • Thrillhouse763@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      And the numerous QBs before him in the mid 2000s.

      Chiefs also had some great Olines in the 2000s while blocking for the likes of Trent Green, Brodie Croyle, and Damon Huard.

  • n_11_lopez@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think the success of an NFL offense is too complex to boil it down to these two things. An o-line can be top 5 but is way better at run blocking than pass blocking. The OC may not be a good play caller (i.e. knows how to get a QB in rhythm, or set up bigger plays, or situational play calls). The OC may also not be a good play designer (i.e. creating ways to get star players the ball in space, playing defensive matchup rules against them). These are only a couple of things that go into it that muck up the waters for this debate.

    • MadManMax55@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I feel like this is a call-out to a certain large mustachioed coach in the Atlanta area…

      Though to be fair to him, all of that applies and his QB was objectively terrible.

  • Brodisi_Jr@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Browns have had a pretty good Olines through the years with absolutely terrible QBs. I think both things can happen but it just depends.

    • jmcgil4684@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Bengals have had a terrible (less terrible this year) Line all of Joe Burrows career. He’s been great.

    • bustavius@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Correction: Browns have had good O Lines for the past few years. With the exception of Joe Thomas, the Browns have fielded some awful O Lines for most of their expansion era (with slight exceptions in 2007 and 2014).

  • loplopplop@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The Chiefs O Line in the late 90s and early 2000s may be the greatest ever and their best QB was Trent Green.

  • hairysonorth@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Alex smith was behind an o line that was named player of the week twice, and had a pretty below average season

    Staley Boone Goodwin Iupati Davis®

    • Mother_Wash@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I believe for the chiefs Alex Smith had outstanding lines, and one year did not throw a td to a wr. He definitely got better. Frankly every chiefs team from the early 90s until the last year of Smith and obviously Mahomes had very solid olines with I believe two hall of famers on those lines over the years (Shields, Roaf), and many many really good ones

  • buttfaceszn@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think depending on the permutation of OL quality and QB quality you have different results:

    Elite Top 5 OL and Elite QB = Super Bowl team

    Elite Top 5 OL and Decent QB = makes QB look much better than they are

    Elite Top 5 OL and bad QB = QB looks a bit better than they are, makes OL look much worse

    Decent OL and Elite QB = OL looks amazing

    Decent OL and Decent QB = your average middling team’s situation

    Decent OL and bad QB = QB makes decent OL look terrible, most fans of teams with bad QBs always also claim their OL is terrible

    Bad OL and elite QB = OL looks fine

    Bad OL and decent QB = OL makes QB look terrible, I think this is the cause for most of the guys who look terrible early in their careers and succeed on a new team

    Bad OL and Bad QB = 2023 Jets offense

  • Greek_Trojan@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The year Romo got hurt the cowboys had a dominant online and like a top 5 running game but the qb was so bad that they still got a top 5 pick.

  • Fabulous_Accident_63@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Mark Sanchez used to have great O-Line his first 2 seasons with the Jets and still posted very average numbers. He did get them to the playoffs though but mainly because of their great D.

    • twec21@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’d go to Pennington as an example before I went to Sanchez. Mostly because it was the O-Lines fault the butt fumble happened

  • nope96@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    2015 Cowboys had an o-line about as good as the 2014 unit and went 1-11 without Romo

  • hoobsher@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    2020 Eagles OL had a lot of injuries and inexperienced players, and a lot of week to week shifting around to cover for that, but according to PFF they were still one of the better units on the season, and Kelce played 16 games, which always helps

    and Carson Wentz still shit his pants that spectacularly