• Michigan Senate Democrats propose bills legalizing physician-assisted death for terminally ill patients
  • The concept, legalized in 10 states and Washington, D.C., remains controversial
  • Supporters say it gives terminally ill patients more autonomy. Critics argue it’s ‘not the compassionate answer’
  • AnArchyintheUSA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My body my choice, I say. I should be able to have physician assisted suicide at any point if I choose it.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe you mean if your physician so chooses it. And they likely won’t unless there’s a good reason to do so.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why should any medical procedure a doctor does be the patient’s choice? I don’t think doctors should be forced to perform procedures they don’t want to perform. Why should a doctor be forced to kill a patient that wants to die?

              • halferect@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                They aren’t saying doctors should be forced to do anything, they are saying if they want a assisted suicide that a physician can legally help.

      • AnArchyintheUSA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Part of me understands what you’re driving at, but another part of me wants to end it all on my terms and a doctor should be there to help. I’m not saying you have to agree with me, just voicing my opinion.

    • derf82@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      That would be great, but there is no reason one should be dependent on the other.

        • derf82@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That is just another form of suffering people shouldn’t be forced to live through if they do not want to.

          • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Some would argue that since the ability to remove the suffering is possible, that we should do that instead of being happy a dystopian solution like assisted suicide be praised as an acceptable option. Suicide is already an option. Having it be assisted just gives them another way to milk one last drop of blood from a stone.

            • derf82@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t agree the ability to remove suffering exists on this world. Even free healthcare and universal basic income won’t do that.

              The world is already a dystopia. Forcing people to continue to suffer is the most dystopian to me. Not everyone can easily and especially painlessly end their own life.

              • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Removing entirety might be impossible, but it can certainly be lessened by large degrees.

                I’m not advocating against assisted suicide, people should be able to die peacefully and painlessly when they choose. I am saying that it shouldn’t be the solution to a broken system. Fix the systems so people don’t feel the need to off themselves just to get away from it.

                • derf82@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  We’re never going to fix the system. And even if we could, I don’t think people should have to suffer waiting. That is the problem with saying “well, we need to fix x, y, and z first.” The people suffering have no control over x, y, and z.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope they are able to implement this not just in Michigan but all across the board. I’m not saying suicide is good, but if I were terminally I’ll and unable to afford treatment I’d definitely want to go through medically assisted suicide because that, to me, is a lot more humane and compassionate than squeezing every single penny out of a person or not getting treatment at all and slowly withering away.

    • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t imagine having a terminal painful disease and being told that I just have to wait until the end comes. That sounds inhumane to me. Like severe dementia. I have a former coworker who was her mother’s only caregiver and her mother was in bad shape. Self injurious and violent. I learned the word “autocoprophagia” from her, which means one who eats their own feces. I’d rather commit suicide than put my loved ones through that.