• Contend6248@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Easy, get automation software like Radarr for movies and Sonarr for tv shows, add indexers like Drunkenslug to them, install and connect SABNZBD as the download client to Sonarr and Radarr and lets roll

      • Brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        You forgot the most important part, subscribe to a usenet provider. Your usenet download client can’t download anything without a provider.

          • Mac@federation.red
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nah drunkenslug is an indexer. You need both an indexer and provider to use usenet. Indexers normally cost money via a donation for lifetime or 1 year of download privilege.

            Providers you pay for via different plan types. Some sell “block” accounts where you get XGB of download and once it’s gone it’s gone. Some have a subscription model with a bandwidth allotment. Some have pay a flat fee for unlimited access. All depends on what you’re willing to pay.

            R/usenetproviders has a wiki but I recommend Eweka or NewsDemon

        • figjam
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          No. Its the amplification of the message that is the problem.

            • figjam
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because the more attention the platform gets the more likely corps put time towards shutting it down.

              • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think you overestimate how hidden we are. Anyway if anyone doesn’t want it, they can tag their post to skip it.

                • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I would agree with this but I still think having an opt-out for bot replies is important. That opt-out shouldn’t be compliance.

        • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If blocking the bot prevented their interaction with users and the posts/comments those users make that would be a good solution, but as is blocking is just an “eww I don’t like this, I don’t want to see it” instead of “This entity will not be able to interract with my account/posts”. In this case there is concern regarding the bot’s behavior, and the unwanted exposure it gives to users who may not want it, which blocking doesn’t solve because it doesn’t provide an opt-out from replies, just to stop seeing the replies.