• ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    That’s only true if we let Republicans axe it for real. This is a often-repeated line, but assuming all is lost multiple years in advance isn’t the right way to go about this.

    • SlowNoPoPo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      the entire thing is based of exponential growth like our entire economy, which isn’t going to happen

      republicans may accelerate the decline, but you’re lying to yourself if you think there will be retirement money waiting for you

      • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I seriously doubt it will ever pay out enough to be a primary retirement method, but there isn’t enough evidence yet to say it’s likely to be 100% gone either. As the fund stands now without any legislative input, it’s set to run out after 2035 the earliest.

        It would be a long and difficult road, but I think it’s still possible to keep SS running and/or a meaningfully sufficient replacement. It’s not as though the money required doesn’t exist. It’s just that oligarchs want to help as little as they can possibly get away with.

        The moment we accept that terminating a fund that keeps people alive is tenable, they will be emboldened to do so. Personally I won’t accept it. Hopefully this generation will have enough political power to keep it, but I’m not going to rely on SS to retire either.