More than 99% of people reject Green parties, and instead keep voting for parties and politicians subsidizing a mass extinction.
Would it be ethically correct for the 1% of people who don’t want a mass extinction, to keep killing the omnicidal class - which the 98% will then find replacements for?
It’s not just the richest 1% who are the problem - yes they cause vastly more harm than the rest, but it’s also the other 98% poorest who vote for the most violent, Machiavellian, narcissists there are to rule them.
I don’ think jack fuck is gonna happen about the climate until the world’s poor and middle class demonstrate violence against these asscunts.
More than 99% of people reject Green parties, and instead keep voting for parties and politicians subsidizing a mass extinction. Would it be ethically correct for the 1% of people who don’t want a mass extinction, to keep killing the omnicidal class - which the 98% will then find replacements for?
It’s not just the richest 1% who are the problem - yes they cause vastly more harm than the rest, but it’s also the other 98% poorest who vote for the most violent, Machiavellian, narcissists there are to rule them.
Agreed. But we need some leaders / generals.
deleted by creator
Save the person that thinks that calling someone a liberal is an insult. And also is a constructive comment
It IS an insult. They’re all talk, hearts and rainbows but still are ieffectual milquetoast corporatists.