in the same way the guy that stabbed me brought meaningful change to my torso
She brought meaningful change to the mineral composition of millions of children’s bones
“The public do not have outlandish or unreasonable expectations. They expect […] our security and our borders to be prioritised”
They expect […] our security and our borders to be prioritised
I see he’s gotten the 14 words down to just 10.
He’s a big fan of austerity, after all
Tsk, tsk, tsk. He could have gone down to four words: “All hail Margaret Thatcher!”
He is saying this garbage and praising Thatcher, but Corbyn’s an antisemite??
What is this, a zombie apocalypse film? How am I meant to get someone in power who actually will tackle issues I and everyone I’ve spoken to cares about? Oh wait…
deleted by creator
The left is weak and the fascists still claim the left runs the media etc. it’s crazy
because to fascists, neoliberals are “the left.” To fascists, the neoliberals are a cabal of “globalists” eroding national interests, the family unit, the traditional culture, religion, etc. Because whatever Capitalism as a system does, fascists attribute to “the left.”
Marx said:
The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his ―“natural superiors”, and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous ―cash payment. It has drowned the most heavenly ecstasies of religious fervour, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of egotistical calculation.
The fascists see “the left” as responsible for this because capitalist neoliberals are “the left” from their twisted perspective. Fascists often posture as anti-capitalist on this basis.
Mussolini said in his last testament:
When it is written that we are the white guard for the bourgeoisie, it is the vilest of lies. I defended, and I state this with full conviction, workers’ progress. Amongst the principal causes for the fall of Fascism I blame the deaf and merciless fight of certain financial and industrial groups who, in their mad egoism, feared and hated Fascism as the worst enemy of their inhuman interests.
So fascists often see themselves as the “true champions of the working class”. Obviously they aren’t, but that doesn’t stop them from seeing themselves that way. You see it with Trump ranting about the “forgotten man and woman” of the “flyover states.”
In 1847, long before fascism ever existed as a named doctrine, Engels described “reactionary socialists” in his work “Principles of Communism”:
[Reactionary socialists are] adherents of a feudal and patriarchal society which has already been destroyed, and is still daily being destroyed, by big industry and world trade and their creation, bourgeois society. This category concludes, from the evils of existing society, that feudal and patriarchal society must be restored because it was free of such evils. In one way or another, all their proposals are directed to this end. This category of reactionary socialists, for all their seeming partisanship and their scalding tears for the misery of the proletariat, is nevertheless energetically opposed by the communists for the following reasons:
(i) It strives for something which is entirely impossible.
(ii) It seeks to establish the rule of the aristocracy, the guildmasters, the small producers, and their retinue of absolute or feudal monarchs, officials, soldiers, and priests – a society which was, to be sure, free of the evils of present-day society but which brought it at least as many evils without even offering to the oppressed workers the prospect of liberation through a communist revolution.
(iii) As soon as the proletariat becomes revolutionary and communist, these reactionary socialists show their true colors by immediately making common cause with the bourgeoisie against the proletarians.
Excellent post
The current Labour party was certainly the crowning achievement of Thatcher’s legacy.
Thatcher walked so that Tony Blair can run
Literally what Thatcher said back in the day.
I dont pay attention to the politics of places that dont exist but isnt this the chucklehead that suspended Corbyn, or something?
Corbyn is such a wimp, he tried to play nice with the rightwing of Labour, even though they were doing everything to sabotage Corbyn’s rule. Once Starmer got into power, they started purging the leftwing Lobourites.
They burned Corbyn and U-turned Bernie
Problem with these elder leaders is they put too much stock in the instiutions and niceties. We need more spice on the left.
By shutting us out so completely from neolib institutions, they’re basically making sure that will happen by creating generations of people that have nothing to lose politically by going hard against a party they have no ties to.
To make it to the level that Corbyn and Bernie did in bourgeois institutions more or less necessitates a lack of spice. Entryism is always doomed to fail.
He should have asked himself what would Vladimir Ilyich have done
Yes
die die die die die die die die die
[redacted] yourself you fucking nonce
Really cementing his legacy
As an American, the UK seems like a much more shitty and horrible place to live.
I think it depends. Our safety nets are significantly better and our homeless problem is comparatively non-existent compared to the US homeless quantity. 500k homeless vs 5k to put it in perspective (we use the term rough sleepers for the equivalent of what america uses). The 200k homeless figure we publish includes people living in any form of temporary accomodation, including staying with friends. We have the NHS too, which while strangled and coming apart at the seams is still free at point of service and doesn’t ruin anyone’s lives for using it. Additionally you don’t have to worry about getting shot by our cops which is a slight improvement, although any protesters need to worry about them and they’re definitely the biggest rape gang in the country.
With all that said however, working people have it rough. The quality of life for people in work is not nearly as good as america because cost of living is so high and wages are comparatively low.
It really depends on what you’re looking at and comparing. America is more brutal to anyone that has even the slightest mishap in life whereas Britain is not. But Britain is fucking horrific to people at the low to mid income range of work. I think most people would take the security and safety of Britain over America but a lot of upper-middle to high income people would certainly prefer the latter. There’s a reason so many skilled professionals leave the country, they can get better wages elsewhere.
Makes sense thank you for sharing with me
It’s quite shit right now but ngl I wouldn’t want to live in America either. There are some things I value that we have here which is why it’s ever more of a shame it’s going down the shitter.
Like what?
healthcare for one, lack of armed crazy people another
Just for clarification, were not arguing here, i dont think US is better. Isnt your healthcare system going to shit too?
oh absolutely it’s going to shit but the American healthcare is already there
Our healthcare is being deliberately mismanaged so it can be sold off piecemeal and eventually turned into yours
Eh, to be honest I think part of the reason why the NHS looks better is because while american healthcare sucks and is too expensive, you brits have never experianced it in comparison to your own.
I watched philosophy tube’s video about the NHS and honestly it seems like the NHS is a government agency dedicated to wasting tens of billions of dollars to maintain the appearance of healthcare so people can feel good about themselves until they actually need it. I for one prefer to know that at least while I might be financially ruined at a hospital or receiving gender affirming care, at least I can get it.
The NHS is very good for healthcare for people with serious injuries and terminal conditions
gender affirming care is considered a quality of life treatment rightly or wrongly treated as the same category as old people getting surgeries to walk better, hearing aids, and cataract treatment and the NHS is mismanaged deliberately by people that want to destroy it especially by making it so there are very few resources to go into that kind of care
if you broke a leg they would see you that day and have it set free of charge and you wouldn’t need to worry about ambulance costs or networks or anything. They are also good for serious illnesses like cancer
There is a fairly simple comparison to make here, the UK life expectancy is 80.9 years while the US life expectancy is 77.2 years.
Healthcare in the UK is bad for anything that is a non-emergency, this is certainly true. You will be treated fast in the US system for these things. But critical care is still very very good.
Obviously other factors play into this as well, like diets, health and safety, workplace regulations, food regulations and so on. But I don’t think the NHS provides poor care to those who absolutely need it. The problem is the in-betweens and things like gender care that are politicised topics.
You’re also not getting lesser care if you’re poor, which is a major and important factor. Nobody has “bad insurance” here.
that’s good to know, Maybe Starmer should take some swimming lesson from the iron lady
Isn’t Kier MI5
Very likely
Former Human Rights Lawyer turned CPS stooge. No specific MI5 connection I know of, he just wouldn’t prosecute them for anything.
deleted by creator
Labour radicals of the past would’ve beaten the shit out of him for this. No hesitation, they would have absolutely gone after him for it. And it would have been the end of labour.
natural entrepreneurialism
human domestication is real
Serious question: is there any chance at all some actual leftist party could form in the UK? I mean I’m not talking about a party that could immediately challenge power, but maybe a new party that could immediately become #4 and then maybe pass up the LibDems soon? It’s all still bourgeois democracy but still.
