• jackoneill@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah but who gets to draw that line though? I agree that this kind of speech is harmful, but if we leave it to the dipshits in Congress to decide what is and isn’t hate speech that kind of shit will be allowed and any speech against the oligarchy will be considered hate speech. I draw the line as a citizen by not giving them my time, but I feel like if you going the government the power to arrest folks over speech alone things will get real bad real fast.

    • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah but who gets to draw that line though?

      A law that delineates what hate speech is and its consequences, limiting it to speech against sex, gender, orientation, race, ethnicity, faith and disability. Like sane countries do.

      • jackoneill@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s all perfectly reasonable, I just don’t trust American lawmakers to do that. Then again, I don’t trust them to pass a budget or let the government stay open or fulfill other basic functions of their job, so……

        In principle we are in agreement for sure. I guess we shouldn’t base potential policy based on the incompetence of our lawmakers, but ignoring their incompetence has risks of its own

        I hate being an American. If I could pack my family up and leave for a better country I would.

        • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Totally get what you mean. It might be easier for these protections to exist on the local or state level, but of course it’ll vary dramatically state to state.