• garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The announcement immediately rocketed McCarthy to the top of the private sector’s target list of former members of Congress who would be powerful additions to a company payroll. McCarthy was a prolific fundraiser as Republican leader and later speaker, where he built a deep network of CEOs and major donors.

    Straight to lobbying to make things worse.

    • roguetrick@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is actually a different take than I’m used to though. The power they’re saying he has comes not from his connections to the STATE, but connections to the oligarchy. Is America finally turning the corner in how it perceives itself?

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s been corporate feudalism justified by a priesthood of politicians and lawyers for quite some time, just like Europe was once feudalism justified by the priesthood of the church.

        • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The Power Elite is a famous book on this subject. Focuses purely on American families and their aristocratic hold on government and industry.

          It was published in 1956 as a criticism of the status quo. Things have only gotten worse since.

  • elbucho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Aww - poor little baby didn’t get to play Speaker, so now he’s taking his ball and going home. Sad.

    I think that if McCarthy really does follow through on rage quitting, it might actually be the first time in his life he’s kept a promise.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m willing to bet he got offered stupid money to be a lobbyist and this is probably a net win for him.

  • Bipta@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    McCarthy was one of the key players in the decline and fall of America. When he went to Maralago he fucked us all more than everything else he’s done combined.

  • Infinity187@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    What a little bitch. This fuck sabatoged his own position, which then lead the house into chaos because fucktards like mtg and the pedophile had his balls in their vise, gets booted from his position for doing the one OK thing he’s ever done in his life and then tucks tail and runs cause he knows he’s an empty vessel. Fucking garbage.

  • paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    McCarthy also gave a vague hint about his future plans: “I look forward to helping entrepreneurs and risk-takers reach their full potential.”

    “The challenges we face are more likely to be solved by innovation than legislation,” he wrote.

    Technocratic venture capital?

    • ivanafterall@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      McCarthy won in 2022 with 67.2% of the vote while his Democrat opponent got 32.8%. So almost assuredly another Republican.

      • Ooops@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        And for the ones following this from far away… How much corruption… I mean election manipulation… no… “completely innocent district restructuring” happened before to make that possible?

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s not quite the way it works.

      Before Santos was expelled, the count was 222 R to 213 D. The “four-vote majority” really meant that Republicans could afford to lose no more than 4 votes on a measure: if five Republicans vote against it, the measure would fail by 1 vote, 217-218, assuming all members voted.

      With Santos gone, the math is 221 to 213, as long as the seat remains vacant. The margin shrunk to 3, because a majority is needed to pass anything, and losing 4 ® votes now ties the vote at 217. When McCarthy leaves, with 2 vacant seats, it will be 220 to 213, but the margin remains 3, because losing 3 votes will still result in passage at 217-216.

      Effectively, each vacant seat is like half a vote is lost. But then it’s more important to see how that seat is filled. I imagine McCarthy’s seat will remain Republican, but Santos ‘s seat on Long Island seems likely to flip, and that would go further to narrow the Republicans’ majority.

      • Rapidcreek@reddthat.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Republicans could afford to lose no more than 4 votes on a measure

        Yes, and after he leaves only 2

          • Rapidcreek@reddthat.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I know razor thin when I see it. With Santos and McCarthy gone and Ken Buck a clear no, how’s that impeachment vote coming along Mr, Johnson?

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      We all know California is a bastion of fiscal responsibility, why schedule a special election at all (and all the cost of keeping polls open) when they will be a perfectly cromulent General Election in November?