Yes there is. It clearly creates doubt as to whether it was generated. As exemplified by the discussion you’re commenting to. Bold to come on and just … say something already demonstrated as wrong…
Can you not even understand what’s happening in front of your own face?
you can easily tell an LLM to sprinkle a couple typos or spelling mistakes into a text
Are you suggesting someone instructed an AI to write an article with typos? Wtf purpose would that serve?
To get exactly this reaction “can’t be ai, it has typos”
Underpaid tech bloggers playing 4d chess
Occam’s razor says no to that.
“Write the article in the style of a junior high student” probably gets close enough to be believable, who needs an editor!
There’s no point in doing that
Yes there is. It clearly creates doubt as to whether it was generated. As exemplified by the discussion you’re commenting to. Bold to come on and just … say something already demonstrated as wrong…
Can you not even understand what’s happening in front of your own face?