• ooterness@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    160
    ·
    7 months ago

    Want to upgrade your F-91W? The open-source Sensor Watch is a board-swap that uses the same display, housing, and wrist-strap but lets you program your own functionality.

  • Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Rolex has spent the last 50 years trying to rebrand itself as a luxury watch brand but they started out as sport watches. Essentially what this Casio watch is.

    The people that designed Rolex watches wanted them to be basically indestructible. They’re wildly over-engineered. They have shockmounts so you can drop them without breaking the balance staff and most are waterproof.

    • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s because Swiss precision is meaningless when a $1 chip can keep time better than a $6k mechanical watch. The only way they can survive is by selling the luxury angle.

      • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        I bought a mechanical watch cause I like how the second hand moves continuously instead of “ticking” and it doesn’t need a battery.
        But yeah, if you want a watch that’s like the early Rolex’s today, buy a Seiko.

        • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Oh trust me, I understand. I own mechanical watches because there is a definite romantic appeal to them.

          However, I have had more than one seiko automatic die from vibration while riding motorcycles. Even high end watches like Rolexes can have -4/+8 seconds per day timekeeping error and be within “normal” tolerances.

          Meanwhile, a cheap digital quartz watch will typically be accurate to within a few seconds a month, even before we consider that many of them can sync to atomic clocks. They’re also pretty much indestructible.

  • Copythis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    7 months ago

    I lost my Casio watch somewhere in my closet about 3 years ago (I am very lazy).

    I still hear it beep every hour.

  • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7 months ago

    I gave my wife a really nice watch made out of wood, with an aquamarine watchface, for her birthday.
    She had wanted that watch for a long time before we even met, but couldn’t afford it.
    Now it’s gathering dust on her nightstand cause she’s afraid she’s gonna forget to take it off before showering, so she’s wearing my old f91w instead.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 months ago

    My wife is in the army. This is the watch that soldiers wear; it has every function you need, and absolutely none that you don’t, and it’s cheap as shit so you can afford it on your crappy military pay. It will not give a flying fuck what kind of abuse you put it through, and in a pinch it will probably stop a bullet.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    I love Casio watches; I’ve got about a hundred of them.

    The F91W is most notable for being the cheapest, brand name watch you can buy just about anywhere. Even the poorest dirt farmer can afford to own one. And it has all of the features most people need.

    That said, it’s not the best option for us westerners. They are very tiny watches, more suited to a child’s wrist than a grown man. A better option is a Casio G-Shock GW-M5610U. It’s solar powered with atomic timekeeping, meaning it never runs out of power and always has the correct time.

    Plus, it’s way more durable compared to an F91W. If I could buy a watch for everyone on the planet, it’d be the 5610.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nice try, but I could buy ten F91Ws for one 5610. Wouldn’t you rather have two watches on each limb AND two watches on your dick than one slightly fancier watch?

    • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Solar powered watches are a useless gimmick. The solar cell’s life span is shorter than 10 years, which is how long a Casio f91w’s battery will last.
      And it’s not more eco-friendly either, cause it needs a rechargable battery which requires lithium.

      • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        I literally have 20 year old solar powered watches that still work. And even if the cell dies in a 5610, it’s easily replaced. You can even do it as a user; they’re incredibly easy to work on.

        And I love the overall convenience of solar/atomic. I don’t give a shit if it’s more eco-friendly or not :D

      • NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I bought an $11 accutron at walmart with a solar cell. It’s gone through the wash and dryer twice and it still works fine

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      They are very tiny watches, more suited to a child’s wrist than a grown man

      As a grown man with child size wrists good I need more options. Most watches I looked at are huge on me. I got a Seiko 5 which fits well though.

      • skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        As another man in the tiny wrist club, it’s truly heartbreaking to find out that watch that looks so good in pictures looks absurd when you put it on yourself. I really wanted a speedmaster but at least with the metal strap, it’s just too big.

        F91W is a truly legendary watch though. It’s what I use 90% of the time although swapping the factory rubber wrist strap with a NATO strap is a worthwhile upgrade. The clasp on the factory strap really likes to break.

        I also actually have a Seiko 5 too, very solid budget friendly automatics. Really big modding community too if you want to get into customization.

      • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yep, some people really need the smaller size. Personally, I’ve got an 8 inch wrist, and anything smaller than 42mm feels tiny on my wrist. I couldn’t physically wear a F91W as the standard strap is just too short to even fit.

    • misterundercoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      The 5610 is great, but might be a bit pricey for some people.

      If you’re looking for atomic timekeeping with a cheaper non-G-Shock Casio, try the WV-58A or the beefier WV-200R.

  • Gonroz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have the calculator watch one and absolutely love it. The reaction people have when they notice is priceless.

  • frezik
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    We’re still one of those planets that think digital watches are a neat idea.

    • Lepsea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Same, bought one after going around trying to find a suitable Gshock with my mate. Coming across this bad boy and found out that people use this watch for a makeshift time bomb timer and terrorists use it because of how reliable it is.

  • yuri@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 months ago

    Casio has a line of ladies watches with floral borders, I wear one as a man and get lots of compliments.

  • radix@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    How did OP drop the watch if they never take that bad boy off?

  • EndHD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    this post reminded me of my old Casio that I forgot on a plane as a kid. left it in those pockets under the tray on the seat in front of you :(

    so I’ve gone ahead and ordered a pink one! :D

      • EndHD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        thank you. men around here always dress like they’re in a funeral during these winter months, so I’m trying to break the stigma and add a splash of colour

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    The amount of compliments I also got from the cheapest watch at a grocery store (also Casio)… I’ve seen listings for some really expensive ones with the same shape and general appearance but different colors and maybe features. Does anyone know what’s up with those?

    • yuri@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Casio does variants of the same model with all stainless steel cases/bands for a bit more, but it’s usually the japan exclusive colorways that see prices north of $70 or so. Casios are usually pretty affordable!

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        $70 isn’t even expensive. Are people really fawning over sub-$100 watches?

        • yuri@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          This perception that cost=quality is so funny. It’s a tragedy that Jules Borel gave up on Mallards. Swiss movements in stainless cases, sold as a price-point piece. Peanuts compared to most shitass luxury watches of the time that used the exact same movement.

          • WoodenBleachers@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            What watch, in your opinion, is worth the cost? I’d like something a little nice, but tend to only buy quality items so I don’t re-buy

            • yuri@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Citizen has some quartz models for ~$60 if you’re looking in the right place. I see a lot of ebay sellers that are authorized vendors and are going out of their way with undercut pricing. Find something all stainless if you can, and go for a screw back if you want to replace the battery yourself. I work at a jewelry store and we get at least one person a month who’s ruined their watch by trying to do a battery change themselves.

              If you want digital, Casio and Timex are both currently doing reissues of extremely functional vintage models.

              I like the look of modern Seikos, but I’ve handled very few myself. In the past they were an absolute bitch to get parts for, but that may have changed.

              Any modern mechanical watch should be absolutely avoided, unless you’re a connoisseur looking for a fancy-pants showoff piece. There’s a reason we’re all on quartz now lmao