• essteeyou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, User Agent is also a header, which the other guy is saying shouldn’t exist.

    • spiderplant@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Some widely spoken language I imagine, Chinese, Spanish, English I don’t care. Since .com is intended for commercial use, the language of the companies biggest market makes sense here as well.

      You’re also forgetting that the likes of google.ru, google.nl and google.every_other_country_code exist.

      Also there are plently of websites the have language selection in the site that overrides that header, look at Wikipedia.

      There are plently of sites in non english languages that cater to non English speakers only, not every site has or needs 10 different translations.

      At this point we also have translation engines in the browser so for pages in languages you don’t know, that you absolutely need to access, you can use it to understand the page to a decent level and/or be able to navigate to a version in your language if available.

        • spiderplant@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I just used it as an example since it’s pretty much the lingua franca of the internet and it’s what we are currently using. The same argument applies to any other language.