misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoStarlink loses out on $886 million in rural broadband subsidieswww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square142fedilinkarrow-up1424arrow-down111cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldgoodnews@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1413arrow-down1external-linkStarlink loses out on $886 million in rural broadband subsidieswww.theverge.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square142fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldgoodnews@lemmy.ml
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·edit-21 year ago for the ISPs it usually isn’t worth achieving Yes that’s exactly my point and is why the government should step in. Okay but…they don’t. Starlink also covers the entire planet and all the oceans, which is simply not feasible with wires.
minus-squarekattenluik@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·1 year agoAnd also simply not necessary to have as many satellites as Starlink does needed to cover the ocean and the rare spots where wires can’t go.
minus-squaregaael@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoAnd we really need that 4K UHD porn to load faster on the hole planet, including the oceans.
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoYou’re intentionally conflating high speed internet access with any internet access at all.
Yes that’s exactly my point
Okay but…they don’t.
Starlink also covers the entire planet and all the oceans, which is simply not feasible with wires.
And also simply not necessary to have as many satellites as Starlink does needed to cover the ocean and the rare spots where wires can’t go.
And we really need that 4K UHD porn to load faster on the hole planet, including the oceans.
You’re intentionally conflating high speed internet access with any internet access at all.