• null@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yup, thus fragmenting the crap out of the fediverse (the last E)

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        If you see massive fragmentation as a feature then I really don’t know what to tell you.

        I guess enjoy?

        • ampersandrew@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m a Linux user. That “fragmentation” is probably a good reason for why that hasn’t been extinguished either. So as far as I can tell, yes, I’ll enjoy the resilience that that implies without fear of it being extinguished.

          • null@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            I really don’t think that’s a meaningful comparison.

            Federation relies on unity – fragmentation ruins that.

            • ampersandrew@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              Well, you can stick to instances that federate with Threads even if/when they misbehave then, but having the option not to is pretty great, from my perspective.

              • null@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                Sure, that’s great while it’s still just “instances that do federate with threads” and “instances that don’t federate with threads”.