• CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hypothetically, could a city or other regional government, or even larger scale one, create a state run development company, under mandate to build up the housing supply in a given area even if investors won’t do it?

    • 15Redstones@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but without money from investors they’d have to cover the construction costs from taxes, so it’s not free either.

      And government run initiatives have to be very careful with how they set their goals. If the legal mandate is to maximize the number of apartments constructed, and the people in charge are rewarded based on the number of apartments they created on paper, then the result will likely be the bare minimum of what counts as “apartment”, even if it’s not something most people would want to live in. That means that government initiatives need to specify in high detail what the quality of the apartments should be.

      Investors have the goal of getting their money back through rent, so they will usually ensure that what they pay to build is something people will actually want to live in and pay money for. If the housing shortage is severe enough they too can get away with pretty crappy places, but if there’s enough housing available that renters can be a little picky, any investor who built bare minimum apartments would regret their choice.