earlyadopter@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoDesigners vs Programmerssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up181arrow-down13
arrow-up178arrow-down1imageDesigners vs Programmerssh.itjust.worksearlyadopter@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squareKnighthawk 0811@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 year agobut that’s exactly how the models are being trained. by manually going through all the images and describing them. and you can’t really complain that computers go through data at a greater scale than humans… that’s the whole point. that argument doesn’t hold
minus-squarezalack@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year agoIt’s worth entertaining the observation that these learning models piggyback off underpaid human effort to funnel wealth towards the 1%. It’s just that the solution isn’t to stop the tech. That never works. It’s out in the world now. The real solution is much harder. We need to overhaul our economy and put in mechanisms to recirculate wealth downwards.
but that’s exactly how the models are being trained. by manually going through all the images and describing them.
and you can’t really complain that computers go through data at a greater scale than humans… that’s the whole point. that argument doesn’t hold
It’s worth entertaining the observation that these learning models piggyback off underpaid human effort to funnel wealth towards the 1%.
It’s just that the solution isn’t to stop the tech. That never works. It’s out in the world now.
The real solution is much harder. We need to overhaul our economy and put in mechanisms to recirculate wealth downwards.