A new crash recently in Alabama, but a reminder to something that we all know. Burning Teslas are far more difficult to extinguish than any other car.

  • dragontamer@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    So there’s basically two phases of an EV Fire.

    1. The initial fire, a blazing hot heat that’s dangerous – You just hit it with water from a distance. You’re correct on the analysis here.

    2. The “reignitions”. Li-ion batteries, once damaged, will reignite spontaneously for hours after the initial fire. So the fire “has been put out”, but we all know that its only for a few minutes. There’s enough time to winch the car into these containers and fill it up with water in practice.

    Its #2 that you’re probably missing. Water / Foam / etc. etc. is only good at stopping phase 1 of the fire. But the next 8+ hours, you need someone to babysit the fire with a hose and keep dribbling water on it before the fire is permanently put out. Or… you know… do like a European and use a container and fill it with water, so it can babysit itself.

    • schmidtster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Sand and some types of foam prevent #2.

      The person would be at risk while rigging it up, you would have to stop spraying while getting it into the box, giving it time to reignite while the person is right beside it.

      This is like those fire suppression grenades, great concept, but fails in theory since they are massive safety concerns to go with them.

      And it can’t babysit itself, the FD would still be onsite while the vehicle sits in the tub, just let it burn off at that point and than it’s dealt with in a couple hours.

      I don’t see Europe actively using these from any research I’ve done, just a few concepts and nothing more. Since it’s a safety concern to be able to use these.

      • dragontamer@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Sand and some types of foam prevent #2.

        Do you have a demo of this working? A .pdf report on the amount of sand and/or foam needed to achieve this?

        European fire-departments are moving towards this full-submerge tactic because it works. Its one of the big developments in firefighting technique over the last 5ish years.

        When we’re dealing with 1000lbs / half-ton battery packs, the sizes needed to actually effect these fires grows dramatically. I don’t think that fire-departments will be in the business of carrying dumpsters full of sand to try to extinguish these fires… but I dunno, if you got some numbers on the quantity of sand needed to achieve the suppression of the fire we can compare notes.

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yes plenty of places in the states have sand as their official policy. No real difference than your water container than for the sand container, but you can also just cover it without the container as well, this is the preferred method for personal safety, just would need more.

          Same is also easier to remediate than the water as well, some places use wet sand. Best of both worlds, but still need to remediate the water.

          • GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            How does sand stop the internal exothermic reaction, though? I could see wet sand maybe, but just straight sand? It’s not a normal fire and is self-sustaining.

            • schmidtster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Why would it?

              Weighs less and is easier to store and transport than water. Also what about places that freeze? Gonna have an ice cube with a car in it after.

              Not every place is with it easy access of fire hydrants, what about the middle of a highway? Both water and sand would essentially be equally cumbersome to get there.

              • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Just because some places freeze does not mean that all of the water will turn into an ice cube. Water freezes from the top, which then acts as an insulator for the liquid below. This is how ice fishing is possible. Are you just throwing objections at the wall to see what sticks?

                A better objection with regard to freezing would be the fact that leaking water all over a highway presents a road hazard to other drivers. In which case, yes sand might be the better option. That’s why we have different methods for fighting them.

                • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Water freezes from all sides… who told you that?

                  Rivers freeze from the top since the ground heats the bottom and sides….

                  • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    How long do you seriously think it takes thousands of gallons of water to freeze? Especially with a heat source they are trying to extinguish? Can you seriously not accept that there are professionals who know a lot more about this than you?

      • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Every fire puts a firefighter at risk. That’s not a valid argument. This system does not require a person to stand right next to the fire. That’s why the box is deployed by a mechanical arm.