• pendulous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Interesting, I would rank it: Milwaukee >= Dewalt > Makita >… Ryobi. Makita always feels like it was great for 20yrs ago.

    • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      My tool experience is limited, but with Makita you seem to be describing the same anachronism principle you find in espresso machines.

      Arguably the best espresso machines in a class are reminescent of the same model you found 40+ years ago. If you’re looking for the B+ range, everything worth buying has a big metal E61 grouphead with manual levers. In the S-class range, you tend to have more manual levers as often as bells or whistles. My new machine that cost more than I deserve (wife bought it) is basically an oldschool machine with nothing modern in it but a PID controller. Legend has it, it will be passed down in my family for generations to come (exaggeration, but not much).

    • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Hmmm. You may be right. I have owned no Makitas. I’m going by tear-down videos. AvE may have gone a bit off the rails, but he’s done some really good tear-downs of different tools, and looked at the quality of the materials, the casting, the motors, switches, and so on. He consistently was impressed by Makita’s build quality… but all of those videos are, like, 6 years old, or older.

      It’d be too bad if even the “good” makers like Makita went the quantity-over-quality commercial route.

      • pendulous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, they aren’t bad tools at all, (Except some of the batteries) They are just a bit dated and bulky compared to the other 2.