I don’t do much handheld gaming, but I’m going to have some overseas flights and long-ish train rides later this year, and may also be having surgery that will keep me fairly bedbound for about a month. I’m just not sure how much money it’s worth spending on a deck that I likely won’t use much outside of those specific cases - I bought a switch when I got covid in 2020 and used it a ton at the time but I’ve only used it a few times since, though I miiight use a deck a bit more just because I already have a pretty extensive steam library.

Is it better to stick to the cheapest model or is there enough of a difference that it might be worth spending a little more for a nicer one?

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    Bigger than 64Gb LCD has faster storage. 64 is EMMC iirc.

    The newer ones all have the faster storage and a better screen

    The older/smaller ones can be had at a discount in comparison

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    I just got my OLED model, and I would get a 512GB version of either type at minimum. You’ll be able to install several things before worrying about SD cards, and you can always upgrade the drive later.

    As far as I’ve read, the battery life in-game sometimes is better, sometimes is about the same, but the screen and the weight are both improved over the LCD version. It’s otherwise pretty much the same. I like OLED and have a few games with HDR, so I’m glad I sprung for the newer model.

    I was in a similar boat and thought I would use it on occasion, but I haven’t played a game on my beefy desktop thus far, not even to stream a title. It’s super convenient to just pick this up and play in the short moments between doing other things, and I’ve read about other people who bought some for their kids as a replacement for a laptop.

    When you throw in tinkering around to add Epic, Amazon, and Gog games via Heroic Launcher, there’s a massive and relatively cheap ecosystem of games you wouldn’t be able to access on a more closed console.

  • shigutso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    I recommend getting the OLED 512GB because it can store plenty of games and it’s better in every way over the LCD model.

    If your budget is absolutely limited, then the LCD model is also great.

  • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    There used to be 3 models sold:

    • 64: LCD screen, Slowest storage, no anti-reflective glass, regular battery
    • 256: LCD screen, Fast storage, no anti-reflective glass, regular battery
    • 512: LCD screen, Fast storage, anti-reflective glass, regular battery

    If your region still has the 64 or the 512 for sell they’ll be highly discounted. The 64 I think it’s not worth it, because it’s too small disk size, the 512 is what I have and I’m very happy with it.

    Currently the three models sold are:

    • 256: LCD screen, Fast storage, no anti-reflective glass, regular battery
    • 512: OLED screen, Fast storage, no anti-reflective glass, large battery
    • 1TB: OLED screen, Fast storage, anti-reflective glass, large battery

    If you don’t care about the anti reflective glass the new 512 is very tempting, 512 is more than enough and you can always put SD cards for extra games. Personally I would go for the highest one, larger internal storage is always preferable to SD cards, the anti-reflective glass is worth it and if you’re going to be travelling a lot the large battery is surely worth it. If the price is too high, the 512 is very close.

    As for the usage afterwards, my deck has seen lots of usage, the biggest problem I have with the switch is very limited game catalogue (not that they don’t offer enough games, but I have very few because they’re really expensive). If you like gaming, the deck is great because it allows you to squeeze 5min gaming sessions whenever you have free time, which a PC doesn’t because it takes 5min to open steam, open the game, load your save, etc, whereas on the deck you unlock it and you’re back where you stopped in a matter of seconds.

    • frickineh@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think the anti-reflective glass is very tempting. I’m not incredibly worried about the battery because basically everywhere I take it will have charging available and I don’t think I can justify the cost of the 1TB model knowing that I really prefer using my PC for gaming whenever possible (which is most of the time, for me).

      This is very helpful, thank you!

      • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        There are screen protectors with anti-reflective coating if that’s the only downside of the cheaper model.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I recommend OLED. Personally I’m glad I went with the top tier. I threw a bunch of indie games on it and a few AAA and there’s room to spare, and the screen is just gorgeous. I definitely use it way more than my switch. The switch is just a bit too small screen and the deck is just right

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I got the 64gb from the wait-list which ended the day before it arrived in the mail. I put in an aftermarket 1tb nvme 2230 and the tiny emmc thing is in my router now. At the time that I did it, I believe the ifixit guide suggested peeling off the foil shield thing but I just slid it off and on to the new one without unwrapping it. It was pretty easy but if you haven’t taken many things apart, just get one of the bigger models. There are a number of annoyances with just 64gb and that model totally existed just for people like me apart from having a drive at all, which is probably so people don’t cluelessly buy one with no drive and complain.

    • frickineh@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t have Instagram, and it won’t let me look at anything without forcing me to create an account. I looked at the website, I just wanted to see what actual users thought.

      • code@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Its really what you can afford. Replacing the ssd with a bigger one is trivial if you are even remotely handy. So the real question is the screen.

        Oled is amazingly better than the lcd ( i have both)

        Battery life in oled is a bigger deal than i thought.

        For me the antiglare screen was a big improvement aseell. My led disnt have it and my oled does. I can play in alot more sifferent liighting with less eyestrain. Some brighter places the led just wasnt acceptable to play. Ive had no issues with led and antiglare

        So if its in budget get the top end oled. Else look for the 512 led with anti glare

        • frickineh@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I am an old person who is big on reducing eyestrain, so that’s probably a solid argument for upgrading to an oled model. There won’t be much point in buying one if I can’t stand to play it.

      • Vode An@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Every model has a different fanbase, maybe check to see if the ones your choosing between have subreddits. They usually promote free content there.