Tesla Cybertruck gets less than 80% of advertised range in YouTuber’s test::A YouTuber took Tesla’s Cybertruck on a ride to see if it can actually hit its advertised 320-mile range, only to find out that its could only reach 79% of the target. When YouTuber Kyle Conn…

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Frequent lite braking allows the regenerative brakes to do all or almost all the work, meaning you recover a good chunk of the energy you’re using in city/stop-and-go traffic.

    Infrequent braking or hard braking (which requires the service brakes) means less energy recovered, so shorter range.

    • asret@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Braking does not increase range. Regenerative braking reduces the losses involved, it doesn’t eliminate them. Your last sentence makes it sounds like not braking enough will lower your range - that isn’t the case.

    • Андрей Быдло@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hmm. So it’s a sneaky little argument for EVs for an in-city use? I wonder why no company screamed about it through a loudspeaker. If that’s so, it’s a killer feature for most drivers

      • hperrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It was one of the main selling points of the Prius (which has regenerative braking). Great gas mileage, especially in city driving.

        • SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          This is correct. I’m a Prius driver. I get 45-55 mpg on the highway, depending on conditions. If it’s just city driving, I get 55-65 mpg. I’ve had as high as 72 mpg, many years ago driving Uber downtown.

          • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            And with a plugin model Prius… you won’t use the ICE power unit at all on a typical commute (25 mile battery range on the current models).

            • SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Man, don’t I know it. The 2023 Prime is out with a 39-44 mile range, which would cover about half my total daily commute, plus my employer has free charging. Someday…

              I’d happily trade it all for robust public transportation, though.

      • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        If I’m not mistaken, the much more important element is air resistance. The power-efficiency ratio of electric motors is nearly constant, meaning the energy usage per unit distance is nearly the same at all speeds, but there is more air resistance at high speeds.

        • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          You are correct. Electric motors are 100% efficient, so a combination of air resistance at speed as well as more regenerative braking being done during city driving are the reasons for better city driving effective mpg.

          • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Electric motors are 100% efficient

            Umm what? Have you never heard of the laws of thermodynamics? I mean, the overall thrust of your argument is correct, but that statement is just nonsense.

            Oh, and using regenerative brakes will always waste more energy than not using brakes at all and simply moving at a constant speed. Regenerative brakes are only efficient compared to conventional brakes, which waste all of their energy as heat. Braking more in the city driving doesn’t improve an EV’s efficiency there compared to using that same EV on a highway (aside from the fact that you’re driving more slowly overall,) it just improves its relative efficiency compared to ICE vehicles with conventional brakes.

        • Андрей Быдло@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s the same for a fuel-based cars. Some other users told me about the black magick trickery electric cars do in the city. Guess you’d like to check their replies too.

          • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            Gasoline powered engines are very inefficient in terms of getting all of the potential energy out of it’s fuel source. They do have a sweet spot, usually somewhere between 2,000 and 3,500 rpm and most companies will tune their vehicles to be at highway speeds while in that sweet spot. The rpm range from idle (ICEs needing to idle at stoplights decrease city MPG) up to that sweet spot is less fuel efficient than rolling around in the sweet spot, so a lot of stop and go driving will see a gas motor running out of it’s fuel efficient range quit a bit.

            Electric motors have the same efficiency at any rpm and they don’t use energy while the car is sitting still.

          • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            I saw those after I posted, and I’m a bit surprised. I always thought the reason EVs lose range on highways was closely related to the reason they don’t have gears. I guess I’ll have to revisit it.

              • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                I mean, regenerative breaking isn’t that crazy. An electric motor and generator are literally the same machine, after all.

                You can test it out yourself if you have a hobby motor lying around. When you short the two terminals of the motor, it becomes more difficult to rotate the axle by hand.