Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft said that while he didn’t want to do it, he had to remind people of how “severe” the situation is.

A top Republican official in Missouri is threatening to remove President Joe Biden from appearing on the ballot as retaliation for the determination in two other states that Donald Trump doesn’t qualify because he “engaged in insurrection.”

“What has happened in Colorado & Maine is disgraceful & undermines our republic,” Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft wrote on the social media site X on Friday. “While I expect the Supreme Court to overturn this, if not, Secretaries of State will step in & ensure the new legal standard for @realDonaldTrump applies equally to @JoeBiden!”

Ashcroft’s post came shortly after the Supreme Court agreed to review a decision by Colorado’s high court that found Trump could be barred from the state’s primary ballot because of his actions leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

  • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If fascist win after having Trump removed from the ballot then it makes it even harder to legitimately argue that a particular candidate should stay on a future ballot.

    • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If fascists take over the US, there will never be another legitimate election whether or not we take the correct legal action prior to that point.

      But we’re talking Beer Hall Putsch leniency on Trump, and all that does is empower the actual fascists to take more extreme action knowing they will never face consequences. People are terrified that if they don’t give in to fascists, fascists won’t play fair.

      Guess what? Fascists already won’t play fair.

        • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure. Show me proof the good guys aren’t playing fair taking an insurrectionist off the Ballot because the Constitution demands it.

            • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Preponderance of evidence. The first state concluded the opposite. And the court system seems the right place to challenge.

              Or are you suggesting all 50 states need to unanimously agree or he gets off? Because that goes to being a higher burden of proof instead of a lower one.