I watched most of the South African case. You only need to watch the 10min-30min window where they just quote all their Israeli leaders making explicit calls for genocide.
Is there a point in the Israeli case where they address this? I’d rather not listen to the entire 2.5 hours to confirm it doesnt exist.
Edit: using this upload for reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxGJfdBi3SM
South Africa’s case as well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2vQ7suQWGg
I didn’t watch it but my understanding is Israel’s defence is a bunch of procedural arguments and trying to imply that South Africa is Hamas
So far they’ve been focusing on leaning on allies dismissing it out of hand rather than any of the evidence - because the evidence points to them carrying out a genocide and they’ve broadcasted their intent to do so quite happily in Hebrew.
https://youtu.be/939hSvcH0qM?t=4486 1:14:46 on the SABC News vod. About the next 4+ minutes.
Here they said that nethanyahu also said also avoid to avoid civilian casualties, and Amalek/other quotes are just normal irrelevant war time rhetoric, or out of context, or have other biblical context that South Africa failed to discuss.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Thank you.
Khamas possessed the leaders and made them say it
I found YouTube links in your post. Here are links to the same videos on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Link 1:
Link 2: