• dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes because that is more user friendly than running an executable through a built in compatibility layer… suure

      • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Who tf wants usability when shit just has a solution no matter what. Additionally its an old program that a normal person wouldn’t even try.

        On windows shit just doesn’t work and the solutions are most of the time not even existing.

      • riskable@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re trying to get ancient software to work I think “user friendliness” is the least of your concerns. Especially compared to the alternative (Windows) where the answer is just, “No: That’s not going to work no matter what you do.”