• econpol@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, having a shittily built submarine for a billionaire to visit the most famous shipwreck in the world while then joining those who died there 100 years ago, is a pretty unique story that we’ll now always remember whenever we talk about the titanic.

    • soft_frog@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a real irony in naming your submarine after a shipwreck, neglecting all safety devices like the shipwreck, and talking about how the hull was indestructible.

    • dreadgoat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a lot of complaining about, “why is news covering these billionaires, there’s nothing tragic about their circumstance” versus “you’d have to be heartless not to sympathize with such a horrifying fate”

      But the real villain here is our morbid curiosity. It has nothing to do with sympathy nor classism. Dozens drowning by relatively conventional means? Eh people die every day, whatever. A family dying in a particularly bizarre and agonizing manner? Oooh let’s think about and discuss in detail what their final moments may be like! We can dress it up in hate or dress it up in kindness, but the real reason anybody is interested is that it’s just a weird way to die.

      The world is a stage and we love a good horror story.

    • wr4th4@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      you’re right - if those on the sub do happen to have met their end, at least it was done in pursuit of their dream?